For the past 18 months, employees at several IKEA stores in the United States, including those in Stoughton, Massachusetts, have been attempting to form a union with the United Food and Commercial Workers, the largest retail union in North America. In
response to this campaign, IKEA management has taken a number of actions that violate the company’s official policy of neutrality on unionization.
This week the situation escalated significantly. IKEA “goods flow in” workers at the Stoughton store (just outside of Boston) went on strike after store management turned down their request for union recognition, even though a clear majority of the bargaining unit had indicated support for the union. This is the first US strike in the history of IKEA, and if the workers succeed in getting union recognition, it will be the first IKEA union in
the country.
When it comes to respect for the right to form a union and engage in collective bargaining, there’s no doubt that IKEA talks a good talk. In 2004, IKEA signed up to the United Nations Global Compact, an international effort to encourage socially responsible corporate practices. Moreover, IKEA’s internal company code of conduct (“Good Business with Common Sense”) states: “The IKEA Group supports every co-worker’s right to freedom of association…. We respect the rights of co-workers to join, form or not to join a co-worker association
of their choice.”
But how does IKEA’s paper commitment to the right to form a union compare with how it actually treats workers in the United States? The first thing that IKEA did when faced with organizing activity at several of its
US stores (IKEA workers in College Park, Maryland; Seattle, Washington; and elsewhere are also attempting to form unions) is engage the services of Jackson Lewis, perhaps the most notorious law firm in the country that specializes in so-called “union avoidance.”
There’s absolutely no doubt why IKEA engaged this particular law firm. Consider the official biographies of the two Jackson Lewis attorneys hired by IKEA: One of them runs seminars that “provide the strategies and tools companies need to determine how to respond effectively and aggressively to labor organizing.” The other “advises employers on how to remain union-free when confronted with union organizing.”
Hiring these lawyers makes a mockery of IKEA’s claims of neutrality on unionization. The decision is analogous to hiring
the nation’s preeminent climate change deniers to meet its sustainability targets.
IKEA management has attempted to create a climate of fear within US stores through its anti-union behavior.
Since hiring Jackson Lewis, IKEA management has taken a number of anti-union actions. At Stoughton and elsewhere, store management has distributed official letters telling workers that the union is a sinister “third party” that is invading their privacy,
intimidating workers and tarnishing the good reputation of the company. In reality, it is management that has the power to fire workers, refuse them promotions, deny them full-time work (an issue of enormous importance within the stores) or alter their
schedules, making it possible for them to balance work, family and school commitments. The union has no similar power over the employees, and IKEA’s “at will” employees risk a lot by openly supporting the union.
Moreover, IKEA management has used its non-solicitation and social media policies to prevent employees from discussing unionization or hearing from pro-union workers both inside the stores and in public areas outside the stores. The company recently settled
a charge with the National Labor Relations Board accusing it of violating federal law for using social media policies to clamp down on discussion.
IKEA management has attempted to create a climate of fear within the stores through its
anti-union behavior. Workers say that its activities have had a “chilling effect” on union activities within the stores.
IKEA is not the only European multinational that has signed up to leading labor rights standards but failed to uphold
them in its US operations. Nor is it the only corporation that respects the rights of its European workers but systematically violates labor rights in the United States. But that does not make its behavior any more excusable.
Instead of lowering the bar even further when it comes to respect for labor rights in the United States, IKEA, based in Sweden, a country in which workers
enjoy among the strongest labor protections anywhere in the world, should be setting the standard.
By striking for union recognition, Stoughton workers are letting IKEA management know that they are no longer afraid. They are demanding that the company respect their right to form a union, not just on paper, but also in reality. IKEA should do the right
thing and respect the rights of its workers in the United States, as well as those in Sweden.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.