Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
As the clock ticks toward a late-week House vote promised by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California), Democrats consider the possibility of passing the Senate version of the health care bill without a direct vote.
This procedure, known as a “deem-and-pass” or a “self-executing rule,” would allow the House to vote on a package of more popular “fixes”‘ to the Senate bill – when these are passed, the Senate bill is also “deemed” passed.
Though it is one of three options under consideration for the coming House vote, Pelosi said she prefers it, as it would politically protect legislators who are reluctant to publicly support the bill. “It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know,” the speaker said in a roundtable discussion with bloggers Monday. “But I like it because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.”
The measure has been painted by Republican opponents as unconstitutional as well as a move to avoid potentially stigmatizing public affiliation with an unpopular measure. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) said, “anyone who endorses this strategy will be forever remembered for trying to claim they didn’t vote for something they did.”
However, a memo released by the House Rules Committee on Tuesday morning, defending the historical nature of the deem-and-pass rules, noted that the tactic has been used “far more often by Republicans than Democrats” over the years.
“For starters, despite what the minority may claim, the precedent for adopting a resolution and at the same time concurring in a Senate amendment to a bill was set back in 1933,” the rules memo stated. The measure has been used numerous times over the past 20 years, although never to pass legislation as large as the $875 billion health care bill.
However, the question for Congressional Democrats is whether it is passing the bill or passing on the bill that could be more detrimental to them in the upcoming elections. Along with renewed pressure by progressive advocacy groups to include a public option, President Obama has been meeting separately with undecided Democrats to persuade them to support the bill.
According to Paul Begala, a Democratic strategist and former adviser to Bill Clinton, if the Democrats fail to pass the health care legislation, they will lose the House in upcoming election. However, “if they pass health care, they go into a tough environment, but they have an accomplishment, plus one that will provide benefits.”
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.
