Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
The Center for Media and Democracy filed a letter with the Texas Attorney General on Thursday refuting efforts by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to declare itself immune from the state’s open records law. Texas is the first known state where ALEC has formally asked an Attorney General for an exemption from sunshine-in-government laws, and it marks a new low in the organization’s attempts to advance its legislative agenda in secret and avoid public accountability for facilitating special interest influence.
“You cannot just create a special private club between lobbyists and lawmakers and then claim your communications with legislators cannot be disclosed to the public under state sunshine laws,” said Lisa Graves, the Executive Director of the Center for Media and Democracy/ ALECexposed.org, “Allowing this would only increase the power of special interests to secretly influence officials elected to represent real people.”
ALEC has recently begun stamping its documents with a “disclaimer” asserting that materials like meeting agendas and model legislation are not subject to any state’s open records law. Because of that disclaimer, on July 17, Rep. Stephanie Klick asked Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott for an opinion about whether she was required to comply with CMD’s open records request for ALEC-related materials.
On July 31, ALEC’s Washington D.C. law firm sent a letter to Attorney General Abbott asserting that ALEC should be immune from the sunshine-in-government laws that apply to everybody else on “freedom of association” grounds. On August 15, CMD filed its letter asking the Attorney General to reject such assertions as inapplicable and outweighed by the public’s interest in guaranteeing that ALEC’s relationship with lawmakers remains in the sunlight.
“ALEC’s argument seems to be that corporations should be able to lobby legislators in secret, because the public might send some angry letters or speak out if the evidence of that lobbying were disclosed,” said Brendan Fischer, CMD’s General Counsel. “ALEC exists for special interests to access and influence state legislators, so transparency about this relationship is crucial to make sure representatives are acting on behalf of their constituents rather than lobbyists.”
The press and average citizens are barred from attending ALEC meetings, and legislators rarely disclose if a particular bill they’ve introduced came from ALEC, or if their decision to introduce the bill may have been influenced by ALEC or one of ALEC’s special interest funders. It is largely through open records requests that the public has been able to get some sense of how much ALEC communicates with elected officials and about which bills, as well as the extent of the extraordinary influence ALEC and its corporate members have had over state law.
In addition to ALEC’s “freedom of association” claims, Rep. Klick in a separate letter argues that her interactions with ALEC should be protected under the “deliberative process” exception to open records laws. But that exception has traditionally only applied to deliberations within governmental bodies, not between a legislator and a third-party special interest group funded by lobbyists trying to influence legislation.
In June, CMD filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin against Sen. Leah Vukmir, ALEC’s treasurer, who claimed she had zero ALEC-related records in her office; CMD suspects that she is withholding documents because of ALEC’s “disclaimer.”
Read CMD’s letter to Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott here.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
As Google plans to roll out its new AI search bar, providing shoddy AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site, the consequences promise to be even more explosive. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which 27 percent of our readers find us. If even half of that 27 percent disappears, it will have a devastating impact on our journalism.
The entire journalism ecosystem will shoulder this blow, particularly independent publishers and news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations. If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the inevitability of Big Tech’s AI takeover. Please give today.