Just days before three people were shot in an altercation on a college campus in Texas, fourteen Texas State Senators co-sponsored a National Rifle Association-backed bill to prohibit colleges from restricting concealed handguns on campuses. The legislation closely resembles a “model” adopted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
On January 22, an altercation at the Lone Star College campus in Houston led to gunfire. According to initial reports, one man involved in the fight was shot, and two bystanders were caught in the crossfire. Both suspects have been apprehended; one of the men had a student identification card.
On January 17, five days before the shooting, Texas State Senator Brian Birdwell (R) introduced SB 182, the “Campus Personal Protection Act,” to require all colleges and technical schools to allow concealed handguns on campus for permit holders. The NRA promptly issued a release applauding Birdwell and the bill’s thirteen co-sponsors, and urging Texans to contact their legislators in support of the bill.
In 2008, the ALEC Criminal Justice Task Forceunanimously approved the Campus Personal Protection Act as a model for introduction in other states. The NRA pushed the legislation after the Virginia Tech massacre.
“This Act will officially become ALEC ‘Model Legislation’ in 30 days if there is no objection from ALEC’s Board of Directors,” the NRA noted in its press release. Koch Industries was on the ALEC Board of Directors in 2008 (and remains on the board today); despite this, the company has publicly declared it “has had no role in any ALEC-sponsored legislation concerning gun laws.”
ALEC claims only the public sector board members give the final approval to model bills, but board documents indicate the public and private sector are treated as members of a single board; all board members see the bills ALEC adopts and promotes. CMD has documented how the NRA’s agenda has thrived while Koch has sat on the ALEC board, with ALEC approving “Stand Your Ground” legislation and bills tothwart gun buyback programs, among other “model” bills.
The ALEC board officially adopted the Campus Personal Protection Act as a template for state law 30 days later.
More Guns Make Students Safer?
Versions of the legislation were introduced in Texas in 2009 and 2011 but failed to pass.
When Sen. Birdwell again introduced the Campus Personal Protection Act last Thursday, he said the bill “isn’t just about the firearm. It’s about trusting citizens with their God-given, constitutional rights.”
“We’ve seen the tragedies that occur when law-abiding citizens are forced to disarm while violent offenders break the law,” said Sen. Donna Campbell, another sponsor of the bill.
But the Lone Star College shooting provides another example of the tragedies that can occur in places like schools when individuals are armed and tensions rise. The tragedy in Houston appeared to have resultedfrom a fight between two people. Because the individuals involved in the altercation were armed, two other innocent bystanders have been shot.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.