As hundreds of thousands of workers strike across the country in a summer marked by increased labor activity, Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) has introduced a bill that would allow workers on strike to access government food assistance and make it easier for workers to exercise their labor rights.
The Food Secure Strikers Act of 2023, introduced onThursday, would repeal a Ronald-Reagan era provision of federal law that excludes striking workers from qualifying for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, despite the fact that many workers are not paid during a strike.
It would also allow SNAP coverage for people in otherwise eligible households in which a member of the household is on strike, and provide benefits for public workers who are fired for going on strike, who often fall under a category of having “voluntarily quit,” rendering them ineligible for SNAP.
In a statement, Fetterman called the legislation “just plain common sense.”
“Every union worker who is walking the picket line this summer needs to know that we have their back here in Washington,” he said. “The union way of life is sacred. It’s what built Pennsylvania and this nation. It is critical for us to protect workers’ right to organize, and that includes making sure they and their families have the resources to support themselves while on strike.”
Representatives Alma Adams (D-North Carolina) and Greg Casar (D-Texas) introduced the bill in the House.
“We need to get rid of the anti-union provisions in our code that starve striking workers,” Casar said. “We’re seeing workers exercise their rights across the country by going on strike to demand better wages and working conditions. That’s why our bill, the Food Secure Strikers Act, is more important now than ever.”
Workers are not paid during a strike. Sometimes, unions can provide support to workers using strike funds, but they are rarely enough to supplement the loss of income from a strike. As labor advocates have pointed out, this means that workers can sometimes be forced to choose between exercising their right to strike for better working conditions or being able to put food on the table.
Strikes can go on for weeks or months, often creating financial strain for workers. In February, coal miners in Alabama ended a strike that lasted nearly two years, with most workers being forced to take other jobs during the strike. Film and television writers in the Writers Guild of America have been on strike since May, and studio executives have essentially admitted that their tactic is to make writers lose their homes and starve them out before they return to the bargaining table.
Fetterman’s legislation, which is cosponsored by 13 senators, including Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), would tip the scales ever-so-slightly in favor of workers, who are currently at a major disadvantage in labor disputes due to the U.S.’s extremely employer-friendly labor laws.
The bill has been endorsed by a number of labor unions and anti-hunger groups.
“It’s good to see lawmakers attempting to correct the wrongs of the past by reinstating a benefit for striking workers that never should have been taken away in the first place,” said Teamsters President Sean O’Brien. “Congress should never pass laws that punish American workers and hopefully this amendment is a repudiation of that practice.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.