In a 3-2 vote Tuesday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved net neutrality regulations that will ensure cable companies provide consumers with equal access to legal web sites and content.
The rules are less stringent for wireless network providers like AT&T and Verizon, allowing them to block applications and services that do not directly compete with them.
Part of the plan also requires that both wireless and broadband providers be transparent in their network management.
Media reform groups and politicians across the spectrum have opposed the plan since the FCC took over the debate earlier this year. In April, an appeals court also cast doubt on the FCC’s ability to regulate the Internet, throwing out its 2008 cease and desist against Comcast for slowing and ending BitTorrent transfers.
At the time, the court ruled that the FCC did not have the authority to prevent cable companies from abusing their power, leading net neutrality advocates to pressure the agency into reclassifying Internet providers as “common carriers.” Under those regulations, the FCC would be able to monitor and enforce neutrality rules. Today’s approved plan does not reclassify the Internet as a common carrier.
Consumer watchdog organization Free Press called the order a “squandered opportunity.” Managing Director Craig Aaron stated, “The new rules are riddled with loopholes … these rules don’t do enough to stop the phone and cable companies from dividing the Internet into fast and slow lanes, and they fail to protect wireless users from discrimination.”
Sen. Al Franken (D-Minnesota) spoke out against the impending regulations Saturday, stating on the Senate floor, “If corporations are allowed to prioritize content on the Internet … there is nothing to prevent those same corporations from censoring political speech.”
Comcast also received negative attention earlier this year when Netflix partner Level 3 Communications and wireless modem manufacturer Zoom Telephonics filed complaints against the company for unfair practices.
Comcast allegedly charged Level 3 a fee for delivering streaming video to Netflix and threatened to block access to its services if the company did not pay. Zoom also accused Comcast of violating existing FCC regulations by preventing consumers from using third-party modems to connect to Comcast’s network. Level 3 chief legal officer Thomas Stortz said at the time, “Comcast demonstrates the risk of a ‘closed’ Internet, where a retail broadband Internet access provider decides whether and how their subscribers interact with content.”
A coalition of satellite and Internet-based companies including Netflix, Dish Network and Skype met with the FCC earlier this month to discuss whether the agency’s proposal is enough to ensure an open and free Internet. Their concern included whether Internet service providers will be able to “exploit their dominant position and favor their own content and services, or those of select paying partners,” Reuters reported the group stating in a letter. Paid prioritization is “an unjust and unreasonable form of discrimination.”
The FCC vote also precedes the agency’s highly anticipated review of a possible NBC-Comcast merger, which would create a conglomerate controlling broadcast Internet, cable, movie studios and theme parks.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 5 days to add 340 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.