Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a Republican who bills herself as moderate on issues of abortion rights, said on Tuesday that she will not support legislative efforts being proposed by Democrats to codify such rights into federal law.
The Women’s Health Protection Act, which is expected to pass in the House of Representatives, is bound to face difficulties in the Senate, as it could be blocked by a Republican filibuster. However, the bill’s prospects would have been somewhat better had Collins expressed her support.
The legislation, if it became law, would protect abortion access throughout the entirety of the United States. Among a number of other items, the bill would disallow state-imposed restrictions, including 20-week abortion bans. It also seeks to end requirements like ultrasounds and counseling services before abortions are performed — rules imposed by many states across the U.S. to shame and discourage individuals who are seeking abortions.
Collins said she supports the idea of codifying Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case recognizing abortion rights, citing instances in the past when she’s done so. But despite escalating attacks on bodily autonomy and reproductive health care in states across the U.S, Collins expressed an unwillingness to do so now, complaining that the current bill goes too far.
“I support codifying Roe. Unfortunately the bill … goes way beyond that,” she said, per reporting from The Los Angeles Times. “It would severely weaken the conscious exceptions that are in the current law.”
Collins also said that she believes the bill would weaken religious freedoms. She left open the possibility of supporting a less protective bill from Democrats in the future.
Her opposition to the legislation will likely lead to more distrust from her pro-choice colleagues on Capitol Hill, as her actions have demonstrated she is no longer an unwavering voice on the issue.
On social media, critics took note of Collins’s opposition to the bill, and condemned news articles with taglines claiming that the lawmaker supports legal access to abortion.
“We don’t *have to* say Collins ‘supports abortion rights’ when she clearly doesn’t. Just because she says so,” wrote Elie Mystal, justice correspondent for The Nation.
In recent years, Collins has turned her back on abortion rights activists more than once, particularly when she voted to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018, despite his alleged history of sexual assault and the fact that many rightfully believed he would be an anti-abortion vote on the Supreme Court’s bench. Earlier this month, Kavanaugh joined four other conservatives on the Court in refusing to hear challenges to a restrictive abortion law in Texas, which bans the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
Collins suggested she did not regret her vote for Kavanaugh, and defended the Court’s actions this month, arguing that there were “serious constitutional and procedural issues” that warranted the Court’s refusal to intervene and protect the legal right to abortion access in Texas. That law, which has so far circumvented federal judicial review, is now being replicated in other parts of the country.
Join us in defending the truth before it’s too late
The future of independent journalism is uncertain, and the consequences of losing it are too grave to ignore. We have hours left to raise the $12,0000 still needed to ensure Truthout remains safe, strong, and free. Every dollar raised goes directly toward the costs of producing news you can trust.
Please give what you can — because by supporting us with a tax-deductible donation, you’re not just preserving a source of news, you’re helping to safeguard what’s left of our democracy.