Democratic lawmakers in Congress have proposed a few responses to a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows an anti-abortion law in Texas to remain in place, but they will likely require centrists in the party and President Joe Biden to take on the dreaded Senate filibuster.
The ruling from the Supreme Court, in which five conservative bloc justices voted against placing an injunction on Texas’s Senate Bill 8, was widely panned for effectively dismantling longstanding federal abortion protections in the state.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) announced on Thursday that the House would vote, within two weeks upon lawmakers’ return from legislative recess, on the Women’s Health Protection Act.
“Upon our return, the House will bring up Congresswoman Judy Chu’s Women’s Health Protection Act to enshrine into law reproductive health care for all women across America,” Pelosi said in a statement.
The bill would protect abortion access across the entire country, and would disallow several state-imposed restrictions on reproductive care, including 20-week bans, mandatory ultrasounds, or counseling that discourages individuals through shaming against getting an abortion.
Several progressive Democrats in Congress are also proposing an expansion of the Supreme Court to defend the rights of Americans.
“We must expand and reform the Supreme Court. Millions of lives are at stake,” said Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York), noting that, beyond abortion, the Court will also likely rule soon on voting, workers’, and other civil rights protections.
Whether by legislation or by expanding the size of the Court, both measures will face fierce opposition from Republicans, particularly in the Senate where GOP lawmakers can use the filibuster to block either route.
Biden has said he’s reluctant to call for reforming the filibuster, much less for its abolition. And centrist Democrats in the chamber have also indicated that that’s a non-starter.
Biden, for his own part, announced Thursday that he’s directing departments and agencies within his administration to look into how the state can protect abortion access for individuals in Texas and elsewhere following the ruling.
Biden plans to “launch a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision.” That includes directing the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice to find ways “to ensure that women in Texas have access to safe and legal abortions as protected by Roe, and what legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties.”
Recent polling shows that the vast majority of Americans, nearly nine-in-ten voters, oppose abortion legislation similar to the Texas law that was enacted this week. An NBC News Survey conducted in mid-August found that 54 percent of Americans believe that abortion should be legal always or most of the time. Just 34 percent said it should be illegal in most cases but allowed in some circumstances, including rape or incest, which the Texas law does not allow for. A mere 8 percent said it should be illegal in all circumstances.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.