Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Plans to Use “Inclusive” Language in Future Discussions on Immigration

While the new language has been praised, advocates are calling for Biden to take concrete action: Stop deporting people.

Central American migrants watch a television airing the U.S. presidential inauguration ceremony at the Migrant Shelter in Ciudad Juarez, state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on January 20, 2021.

The Biden administration announced this week that federal agencies will use “more inclusive” language when it comes to discussing issues relating to immigration.

A memo from Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Tracy Renaud told officials that changes in terminology should be used “in the agency’s outreach efforts, internal documents and in overall communication with stakeholders, partners and the general public.”

Several words that were used by past administrations have been replaced due to their stigmatizing and demeaning connotations. “Alien” or “illegal alien,” for instance, will be replaced by “noncitizen” or “undocumented noncitizen” (or “individual”) going forward. Instead of assimilation, the administration will use words like “integration” or “civic integration.”

More inclusive terms were adopted so that USCIS “aligns our language practices with the administration’s guidance on the federal government’s use of immigration terminology,” the memo added.

Previously, the Trump administration had referred to undocumented immigrants as “illegal aliens,” and described border crossings by migrants as an “invasion” in its official documents. Former Trump official Robert Law, who worked in USCIS, decried the changes.

“By statute, ‘alien’ literally means a person not a U.S. citizen or national. That is not offensive, and neither is ‘assimilation,'” he claimed.

But immigrant rights organizations lauded the decision.

“The entire experience of going through the U.S. immigration system can be dehumanizing,” Juan Rivera, spokesperson for the immigrant rights organization CARECEN SF, said to The San Francisco Chronicle. “I think that the dehumanization of migrants was the fuel for the Trump administration’s further attacks.”

“I really hope that this administration has the courage to embrace all immigrants as humans and to treat migrants with dignity,” Rivera added.

“Language matters. No human is an ‘illegal alien,'” the immigrants rights group Families Belong Together tweeted.

The White House also announced this week that it would be proposing new immigration legislation addressing the issue of granting citizenship rights to those currently living in the U.S.

The proposal would provide a pathway to grant citizenship to millions of immigrants within an eight-year time frame. It would also provide an expedited process for “Dreamers,” undocumented immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children.

In addition to rolling back several Trump-era immigration policies since taking office, the Biden administration has considered building a “virtual wall” to replace Trump’s emphasis on a physical barrier at the U.S.-Mexico border. A virtual wall would use surveillance technologies — including the cameras, x-ray machines, and other methods — to detect, deter and detain migrants.

Immigration activists have spoken out against this policy.

“I think there’s a lot of concerns and red flags about the way border security is framed and also the kind of very chummy relationships between the tech industry and the administration overall,” Mijente senior campaign organizer Jacinta González told Truthouts Candice Bernd.

Others have noted that Biden must make more changes to immigration policy, as the administration continues to deport thousands of individuals who are currently living in the U.S.

“Biden committed to stop deportations. 26,248 immigrants have been deported under his watch,” Cristina Jiménez, an organizer for youth-led immigration rights group United We Dream, tweeted this week.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we have just 8 days left to raise $47,000 in critical funds.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?