Driven by anger toward “political, demographic, and economic changes,” a surge of anti-government extremist groups occurred this year, according to a report released by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
It stated that anti-immigrant vigilante groups, “organizations that go beyond mere advocacy of restrictive immigration policy to actually confront or harass suspected immigrants,” increased by 80 percent. Extremist “patriot” groups jumped by 244 percent last year, with nearly a quarter of them being militias.
It added that the patriot movement made “significant inroads into the conservative political scene,” where groups that “cannot fairly be considered extremist” are still “shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.”
This report, released last Tuesday, comes at a time when several radical, anti-government individuals have carried out attacks in the US.
On Thursday night, John Patrick Bedell, a 36-year-old man from California, allegedly walked up to a Pentagon entrance and opened fire. Officers immediately retaliated; two officers were hospitalized with minor injuries, while Bedell was fatally wounded and died later that night. He had been carrying two semiautomatic pistols and several magazines of ammunition, while more ammunition was found in his car afterward.
In posts on Wikipedia and other web sites, Bedell showed strong anger toward the government. In one podcast, he declared the “seizure of the United States government by an international criminal conspiracy” a “long-established reality,” and called the US military and intelligence services tools of an oppressive regime.
He also posted rants about property rights and the prohibition of marijuana, once saying he grew 16 cannabis plants on his balcony in California to protest those laws. Court records show he had been arrested and charged with illegally growing marijuana in 2006.
Richard Keevil, the Pentagon police chief, said in a morning news conference there was no indication that the incident had anything to do with domestic or international terrorism. “At this time it appears to be a single individual who had issues,” he said.
This comes three weeks after an incident on February 18, where 53-year-old software engineer Joe Stack slammed his plane into the IRS offices in Austin, Texas, killing two and torching the seven-story building. He left behind a long, rambling suicide note rallying against “big brother,” big business, the Catholic Church and the IRS, among other groups.
“Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well,” he wrote.
Several individuals on the web posted comments praising Stack’s actions. Emily Walters of Louisville, Kentucky, founded a Facebook fan group in honor of Stack that garnered more than 200 members before the site took it down. “Finally an American man took a stand against our tyrannical government that no longer follows the Constitution,” she wrote.
Greg Lenihan, an engineer in San Diego, posted on Twitter, “Joe Stack, you are a true American Hero and we need more of you to make a stand.”
The House adopted a resolution to call the IRS attack an act of terrorism on a 408-2 vote, which said it “rejects any statement or act that deliberately fans the flames of hatred or expresses sympathy for those who would attack public servants serving our nation.”
In the same week as the attack, Dianne Capps, a Tea Party movement organizer, called for the hanging of Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) to cheers from the crowd of 500. She compared Murray to a character from “Lonesome Dove,” saying, “What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd? He got hung. And that’s what I want to do with Patty Murray.”
Several liberal columns and blogs have commented on how they perceive an echo of right-wing extremism or extreme Tea Party movement in Stack’s and Bedell’s anti-government messages. Conservative commentators have responded that considering the perpetrators’ stances on subjects such as marijuana, conspiracy theories about secret US military operations and quotations on Marx and communism, they were on the far left.
In an interview, Austin Tea Party co-founder Greg Holloway said that Stack was not a member of the movement and that his use of violence was a strong indicator of this.
“He took the law into his own hands,” Holloway said. “We’re against that. We will never use violence to force our agenda.”
The SPLC has documented 75 domestic terror plots since the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Of these, five between 1995 and 2009 targeted the IRS.
Mark Potok, director of the SPLC’s Intelligence Project, related the recent IRS attack to the rise in the anti-government movement, which attracts thousands who believe the federal income tax is illegal.
“There is a populist rage out there about what is seen as the coddling of rapacious elites, like the mortgage bankers who kept receiving multimillion dollar bonuses, even as working Americans seem to keep losing more and more,” he said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.