A new Pew poll finds Americans are at record levels of isolationism, although large numbers are unilateralist and a plurality see China as the world’s leading economic power.
President Obama clearly didn’t factor public opinion into his decision, announced earlier this week, to send 30,000 additional American troops to Afghanistan. The plan manages to have opposition from every persuasion including theunhappy anti-war base that elected Obama last year as well as Republicans who fault the size of the deployment, the exit strategy and the timeit took the president to arrive at it all.
If he did want to know, however, what people are thinking, an in-depth new opinion poll from the Pew Research Center and theCouncil on Foreign Relationslooks particularly grim: Not only are a plurality of Americans skeptical of success in Afghanistan, they’re feeling more isolationist than they have in four decades of the polling.
Forty-nine percent agreed that “the U.S. should mind its own business and let others get along the best they can on their own” — the highest such mark since the quadrennial survey began in 1964 (when 18 percent of those polled agreed with the statement). Unfortunately, there’s no apples-to-apples poll with the pre-World War II Depression era when isolationism was also rampant.
That current finding casts a somber backdrop to Obama’s trip next week to accept the Nobel Peace Prize; he’ll be honored for inroads outside of the U.S. when such engagement is at its lowest priority back home.
Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center, and James Lindsay, director of studies for the CFR, blamed several factors for the spike in isolationism, from the economic crisis to wariness with the Bush-era style of assertive foreign policy.
“That clearly reflects in great part people feeling burned by the last eight years,” Lindsay said.
But that’s not to say people have embraced Obama’s alternative. Unilateralist views are also at an all-time high in the poll, with 44 percent agreeing with a statement that sounds straight out of the Bush Doctrine: “Since the U.S. is the most powerful nation in the world, we should go our own way in international matters, not worrying too much about whether other countries agree with us or not.”
Forty-seven percent (including 72 percent of Republicans) also said Obama is not tough enough in his handling of foreign policy, a sentiment that likely speaks more to conflicts with Iran, North Korea and in the Middle East than with Afghanistan.
The survey contrasted the views of 2,000 adults in the general public with 600 opinion-leaders who are members of the CFR (all were polled in late October and early November, before Obama’s Tuesday troop announcement). In one instance, the groups differed widely: 53 percent of the public continue to view China’s emerging power as a threat to the United States, while CFR members cast the relationship in much less adversarial terms, with 58 percent saying China will be a more important ally in the future.
Fear among the public may stem from another precedent — for the first time, a plurality of Americans thinks the world’s leading economic power is not the U.S., but China.
The survey mines what in some cases look like contradictory impulses: rejecting Bush’s foreign policy legacy but supporting unilateralism, urging disengagement while faulting Obama’s toughness. What Kohut sees in it all is a sense of uneasiness.
“My takeaway at the end is I think this survey shows both the public and opinion leadership groups are apprehensive and uncertain about America’s place in world,” Kohut said. “Given the variety of economic and geopolitical challenges to the U.S., I guess that’s not unreasonable.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy