Skip to content Skip to footer

Watchdog Group Calls for Term Limits and Increasing Size of the Supreme Court

The report by the Project on Government Oversight comes eight months after Amy Coney Barrett was appointed to the Court.

A view of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

A nonpartisan government watchdog group has issued a new report detailing a number of reforms and changes that could be implemented at the Supreme Court in order to establish more public trust and decrease partisanship in the institution.

Last year, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) organized a panel of former judges and legal experts to examine issues facing the High Court. The organization released its report on possible changes Thursday.

The Supreme Court faces a number of challenges, the report noted, including the fact that it’s become a mechanism for politicians to “win” on issues, rather than being a fair and impartial arbiter of cases that reaches the bench.

“Under the present system, partisans have incentives to control the composition of the courts so as to try to affect the resolution of disputes in a way that furthers particular policy objectives and politics,” the report from POGO said. “This process distorts the actual and the perceived fairness and independence of the courts.”

The report suggests increasing the number of justices currently seated on the Court, entrusting a screening committee to recommend candidates for nominations (rather than having the process start with the president), and creating new ethics rules for justices of the Court to abide by, including rules on when they should recuse themselves.

A “binding code of conduct” could be put in place, for example, ending self-governance practices that justices currently (and questionably) abide by, and having an established code help to “address recusal determinations.”

The POGO report also recommended changes to case selection, as well as having smaller panels of justices hear individual cases, rather than having every member of the Court involved in the final decision, similar to how lower appellate courts in the federal judiciary system work.

The report also suggested that term limits for justices should be considered. An 18-year limit on how long a justice can serve, for example, would guarantee a new pick nearly every two years, the report noted, making the selection process a less-dire one, particularly if that person is not selected to serve for life as they currently are.

“A limit of service on the Supreme Court necessarily creates more opportunities for appointments to the Court,” the POGO panel on reforms wrote. “On its own, one might anticipate more conflicts over confirmation, but combined with the use of screening committees and compositional changes that deemphasize individual justices, the whole package of such reforms can help alter the stakes by lowering the impact of each individual selected.”

The report comes eight months after former President Donald Trump, in the days leading up to the 2020 presidential election, nominated and confirmed now-Justice Amy Coney Barrett, following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last fall. Republicans in the Senate had acted hypocritically when they confirmed Barrett to her post, after they had blocked former President Barack Obama in 2016 from appointing a new justice to the Court due to the proximity of that year’s presidential election.

Before becoming president, Joe Biden pledged to form a commission to investigate ideas for reforming the Supreme Court. In April this year, as president, Biden fulfilled that pledge by forming a 36-member panel, which will report its findings to him within 180 days of its formation.

While many applauded that move, others took issue with Biden’s executive order, as it didn’t require the panel to endorse changes, just to merely examine ideas for reforms that could be considered.

“This White House judicial reform commission has a historic opportunity to both explain the gravity of the threat and to help contain it,” said Aaron Belkin, director of the pro-Supreme Court reform organization Take Back the Court. “But we don’t have time to spend six months studying the issue — especially without a promise of real conclusions at the end.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.