Pakistan needs to be consistent on Muslim hot-zones worldwide and not just in Palestine.
The Rohingya Muslim situation offers Pakistan two distinct choices: It can either sever diplomatic ties with Myanmar over the “slow genocide,” orrecognize the Jewish State of Israel as extending to its pre-1967 borders. A failure to act now will confirm Pakistan’s status as a money-stuffed mouthpiece of the Arab League.
The government’s inability to print its own foreign policy is a recurrent theme in Pakistan. Though the majority party keeps denying it, everyone knows that America or Saudi Arabia are the ones dictating the core text. Public representatives including the Prime Minister can polish the product, but that too is subject to a clear line that cannot be crossed. If not for the Saudi leash, Pakistan’s tone on Israel would be farcical. Here is a country over 2000 miles away with no guns pointing east, yet occupies the popular imagination as only India otherwise can.
So what makes the lay-Pakistani hate Israel? Part of the answer lies in government propaganda. Once the Gen.Zia-Ibn Saud relationship consolidated in the 1980s, the country’s state-owned (and then only) television channel, PTV, plastered images of dead Palestinians on a daily basis. Indeed, other than the Indian army in Kashmir, there was no greater mass of screaming headlines. Concurrently, the Wahhabi strain seeped into Pakistan’s seminaries and raised a new generation of clergy rinsed in anti-Semitism. The public had no chance to think otherwise, drowning as it was in both official and religious fatwas for hating the Jews.
Not much has changed in the twenty-first century, at least rhetorically. The number of television channels has increased, and with it, the individuals spewing hate. As for the government, Pakistan’s Interior Minister Ch.Nisar recently slammed “certain” international NGOs for being agents of Israel and “working against the country.” If there is definitive proof of Mossad’s involvement in anti-state activities, then he hasn’t shared it with the media, or better yet, the UN Security Council. Unfortunately, this blame-game reflects poorly on Pakistan’s well-funded homeland security strategy, and makes you wonder where the money goes.
There is no reason, other than mutual paranoia, why Pakistan and Israel should have to face-off. For starters, both are ideological states that appeared out of thin air. Pakistan challenges the Jewish state’s right to exist, but the same logic applies to its own geography. If embassies open, Israel can understand that Pakistan has comprehensive nuclear protocols that cannot be breached by rogue officials. Pakistan, similarly, will know that Israel selling arms to India is all business and not a global conspiracy against the Muslim “superpower.” If the country’s “all-weather friend” China can play ball withIsrael, why should Pakistan sit aside and sulk?
Saudi Arabia, too, has now kneed Pakistan’s high horse. The long-running rumors of its secret pact with Israel against Iran were confirmed in June, and apparently this hush-hush diplomacy is a year and five meetings old. If the House of Saud can hang with the “enemy,” where does that leave Pakistan? Here lies the government’s golden opportunity to display a foreign policy that is both consistent and nullifies all notions of its slavery to petrodollars. The precedent is simple: Myanmar’s systematic persecution of Rohingya Muslims is analogous to Israel’s misadventure in Palestine. Pakistan can no longer have it both ways and pretend not to be a pawn in someone else’s game. It is time to put up or shut up.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.