Skip to content Skip to footer

Over 1,000 New York Times Workers Stage 24-Hour Walkout

The walkout is the outlet’s largest work stoppage in over 40 years.

People walk along 8th Avenue in front of the New York Times headquarters on March 9, 2020, in New York City.

Workers for The New York Times are staging the outlet’s largest work stoppage in over 40 years, with over 1,100 employees walking out on Thursday for a 24-hour strike, demanding a fairer share of the outlets’ financial success as months of contract negotiations come to a head.

After a marathon negotiation session on Tuesday and Wednesday, members of the New York Times Guild decided to walk out, with the union saying that management isn’t bargaining in good faith and remains unwilling to budge on key issues like wages and benefits.

The union said in a statement last week that management has been “dragging its feet” in bargaining. In the letter, signed by over 1,000 employees, the union says that the company’s wage offers have been “stingy,” management has threatened to cut their pension and health care, and negotiators have refused the union’s efforts to address racism in the company’s performance evaluation system.

The union is fighting for raises that amount to a 5.25 percent average raise over a four-year period. As of Tuesday, management offered half of that — not enough to cover inflationary costs. Management also takes issue with the fact that some union members are video conferencing into negotiations, a practice of “open bargaining” that the NewsGuild of New York, the parent union of the Times Guild, says allows a more democratic and transparent process for contract negotiations.

“When [New York Times] management comes to the bargaining table with their insulting and disrespectful offers, they have to explain it to a room full of their own employees — and they hate it,” the NewsGuild wrote in a tweet on Wednesday.

Departments across the company have been affected by the strike as journalists, marketing staff, security guards, and other workers represented by the union walk out; some desks have lost 90 percent of their workforce, the union said, while some departments will be vacated of Times Guild members entirely. “[T]his was management’s choice,” the union wrote in a tweet on Thursday.

The union is asking that readers not cross the digital picket line during their one-day strike, refraining from reading articles, playing games like Wordle or the crossword, or listening to the outlet’s podcasts like The Daily. Dozens of freelance writers for the paper and members of the New York Times Tech Guild are also participating in the strike in solidarity with the union.

“For ​​the past 20 months we have asked New York Times management, over and over, to bargain in good faith for a new union contract and to provide employees our fair share of the revenue the company has earned from all of our hard and diligent work,” the union wrote in a letter to readers on Thursday. Union members at The New York Times have been without a union contract since March of 2021.

“This is not a decision we take lightly,” the union continued. “Our fight to ensure a living wage for the most vulnerable of us and fair pay for everyone, for evaluations free of racial bias and to protect our health care is really about the future of journalism at The New York Times.”

New York Times president and chief executive Meredith Kopit Levien called the union’s decision to walk out “disappointing” in an email to employees on Wednesday night.

For the union, the contract dispute is underscored by the fact that the company has been doing well financially, even as other media companies like CNN and Gannett are undergoing mass layoffs. Executives have projected that, even after its $550 million acquisition of sports site The Athletic this year, the outlet will make a profit of about $330 million by the end of 2022 — profits that workers say they created for the company and of which they should get a share.

“I’ve worked at the New York Times for almost 23 years — most of my adult life. It’s not just my job: the values and principles of the paper are part of who I am, and I know the same is true for many of my coworkers. In hard times, we were willing to sacrifice to ensure the paper’s survival, and we push ourselves and one another every day to make sure the Times lives up to its highest ideals,” said New York Times film critic A.O. Scott in a statement. “That’s why it’s so dismaying to see our concerns and aspirations treated so dismissively by management, and our contributions disrespected.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.