Skip to content Skip to footer

MO Senate Proposes Bill That Would Allow Murder Charges for Getting an Abortion

The bill does not explicitly mention whether it would criminalize out-of-state travel for abortion care.

A pro-choice demonstrator holds a sign reading "My Uterus My Right" as activists protest outside the Planned Parenthood Reproductive Health Services Center after the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court, in St. Louis, Missouri on June 24, 2022.

A Missouri Republican has introduced a bill that would allow people to be charged with murder for having an abortion in the state.

The bill would give fetuses the same criminal and civil protections of all citizens in the state, and allow Class A felony charges against people who have terminated their pregnancies. Such charges are punishable by up to life in prison.

The bill was introduced by Mike Moon, a Republican state senator who has also introduced bills that would ban transgender kids from participating in sports teams, bar trans youth from receiving gender-affirming health care, and force teachers to out trans kids to their parents. Moon also achieved notoriety last month for saying that he supported children getting married at 12 years old.

“We deserve to live our lives,” said Sam Hawickhorst, a woman who testified against the anti-abortion bill during a Senate Health and Welfare Committee hearing on Wednesday. “We shouldn’t be having an economic and physical barrier caused by being forced to carry a child.”

Similar bills that would allow people to be charged with homicide for having an abortion have been introduced in Texas, Kentucky, South Carolina, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Homicide is punishable by the death penalty in those states.

After the reversal of Roe v. Wade last June, Missouri was the first state to enact a trigger ban to outlaw abortion in the state. While federal law requires providers to perform abortions in medical emergencies despite state abortion bans, hospitals in Missouri have been documented illegally refusing to provide federally-mandated abortion care in emergencies.

Abortion advocates in the state want to put a constitutional amendment on the 2024 ballot that would restore abortion rights in Missouri. However, the Missouri ACLU is alleging that Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey is attempting to coerce State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick into inflating the projected cost of the amendment, which is delaying supporters from collecting the signatures needed to get the measure on the ballot.

“To submit a fiscal note summary that I know contains inaccurate information would violate my duty as State Auditor to produce an accurate fiscal note summary,” Fitzpatrick said.

ACLU-Missouri has sued the attorney general, the secretary of state, and the state auditor for stonewalling the ballot initiation, alleging that the state has missed the deadlines to post the summary and title for the constitutional amendment petition.

“The unilateral actions of the unelected attorney general to hold hostage the people’s constitutional right to the initiative process is an attempt to subvert direct democracy to prevent Missourians from voting on the fundamental right to reproductive freedom,” said Anthony Rothert, Director of Integrated Advocacy at the ACLU of Missouri.

Bailey has made headlines over the past few months for issuing sweeping anti-transgender regulations that would force trans youth and adults in the state to detransition. Several advocacy groups have sued in response, temporarily blocking the restrictions from going into effect.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 72 hours to add 273 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.