As we file this article, Port-au-Prince is thick with gunfire and the smoke of burning tires. Towns throughout the country and the national airport are shut down due to demonstrations. Many are angry over the government’s announcement Tuesday night reporting which two presidential candidates made the run-offs: Jude Celestin, from the widely hated ruling party of President Rene Preval, and the far-right Mirlande Manigat. The announcement betrays another obvious manipulation of what had already been a brazenly fraudulent election. A democratic vote is one more thing that has been taken from the marginalized Haitian majority, compounding their many losses since the earthquake of January 12.
What is at stake in Haiti? What interests underlie the grab for power in the country? One answer is the large amount of aid and development dollars that are circulating. Among those benefiting handsomely from the disaster aid are US corporations who have accessed US government contracts. Below is the tale of one US corporation and its subsidiaries, who have received contracts which involve both a conflict of interest and harm to one of Haiti’s largest and most vulnerable social sectors: small farmers.
“We were already in a black misery after the earthquake of January 12. But the rice they’re dumping on us, it’s competing with ours and soon we’re going to fall in a deep hole,” said Jonas Deronzil, who has farmed rice and corn in Haiti’s fertile Artibonite Valley since 1974. “When they don’t give it to us anymore, are we all going to die?”
Stay in the loop
Never miss the news and analysis you care about.
Deronzil explained this in April inside a cinderblock warehouse, where small farmers’ entire spring rice harvest had sat in burlap sacks since March, unsold thanks to the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) dumping of US agribusiness-produced, taxpayer-subsidized rice. The US government and agricultural corporations, who have been undermining Haitian peasant agriculture for three decades, today threaten higher levels of unemployment for farmers and an aggravated food crisis among the hemisphere’s hungriest population.
Two subsidiaries of the same corporation, ERLY Industries, are profiting from different US contracts whose interests conflict. The same company that is being paid to monitor “food insecurity” is benefiting from policies that increase food insecurity. American Rice makes money exporting rice to Haiti, undercutting farmers’ livelihoods, national production and food security. Chemonics has received contracts to conduct hunger assessments and, now, to distribute Monsanto seeds.
Haiti is the only country in the hemisphere that is still majority rural. Estimates of the percentage of Haiti’s citizens who remain small farmers – or peasants, as they call themselves – range from 66 percent to 80 percent. Despite the farmer-majority, food imports constitute upwards of 50 percent of what Haitians consume, and still the nation suffers under a dire food crisis, with more than 2.4 million of Haiti’s 9 million people estimated to be food-insecure. Acute malnutrition among children under the age 5 is 9 percent, and chronic undernutrition for that age group is 24 percent.
It didn’t used to be this way. In the early 1980’s, Haiti was largely self-sufficient in food consumption and was even an exporter nation. The destruction of agriculture and food security came through policy choices. In 1986 and again in 1995, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) gave loans to Haiti with the condition that the government reduce tariffs on goods imported into the country. While previous tariffs on some staple foods had been as high as 150 percent, by 1995 the Haitian government, under pressure primarily from the IMF and the US government, cut import tariffs on food basics to as low as 3 percent.
Unable to compete with imported goods and thus unable to survive, Haitian farmers have flocked into the overcrowded capital in search of a living. They have joined the ranks of the underemployed or been welcomed by sweatshops, and they have taken up residence in shoddily constructed housing built on insecure land, such as ravines and the sides of steep mountains. The devastating toll from the earthquake, with anywhere from 250,000-300,000 killed in and around Port-au-Prince, is in part due to farmers’ inability to remain in their rural homes.
Rice is among the five most heavily subsidized crops in the US, with rice growers receiving $12.5 billion in subsidies between 1995 and 2009. The subsidized production and its industrial scale, on top of the lowering of import tariffs in Haiti, combined to become a money maker: beginning in the early 1980’s, rice grown in such places as Arkansas and California and shipped by boat to Haiti could be sold more cheaply than rice grown in a neighboring field in the Artibonite Valley. The US television show “Miami Vice” was enjoying high popularity at that time, and, as the threat to local producers unfolded, Haitians named the imports “Miami Rice.”
Between 1992 and 2003, rice imported into Haiti increased by more that 150 percent, with 95 percent of the imports coming from the US. The USA Rice Federation claims on its website that 90 percent of the rice currently eaten in Haiti is from the US.
The flood of imported rice has shot up since the earthquake. In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) purchased 13,045 metric tons of rice for Haiti. In such a dire humanitarian crisis, even Haitian peasant organizations who normally oppose food aid agreed that short-term assistance was essential.
At the same time, however, locally grown food was and is available. “If the foreigners want to give aid, it shouldn’t be food. We have the capacity to produce. They should give us a chance to grow our own food so agriculture can survive,” said Rony Charles, a farmer and member of the Agricultural Producer Cooperative of Verrettes. But a supplemental aid bill in the US Congress – the Haiti Empowerment, Assistance, and Rebuilding (HEAR) Act – which, among other things, would have increased the percentage of food aid purchased from Haitian producers, seems doomed in the face of Republican opposition. Advocacy groups in Washington such as Haiti Reborn will work to get the bill reintroduced in January, but it is unlikely that any local procurement will happen for several years.
ERLY Industries is one US corporation that amply benefits from aid and trade opportunities in Haiti. ERLY is the parent company of American Rice, which has been selling rice in Haiti since 1986 via its Haitian subsidiary, the Rice Corporation of Haiti. By the mid-nineties, American Rice was importing 40 to 50 percent of all rice eaten in Haiti. A press release by the USA Rice Federation, of which American Rice is a member, referred to the federation’s “collaboration” and “proactive efforts” with USDA and USAID in getting rice to Haiti just after the earthquake.
Chemonics, another subsidiary of ERLY Industries, has been running two USAID-funded projects since before the earthquake and received one of the first post-disaster contracts in Haiti, at $50 million, from USAID. Chemonics gets 90 percent of its funding from USAID and works in more than 75 countries. One of Chemonics’ focus areas is agricultural work, with many projects aimed at developing international trade opportunities. Chemonics has also been a large beneficiary of USAID contracts in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
One of Chemonics’ pre-earthquake contracts in Haiti, as in other countries around the world beginning between 2006 and 2010, is the USAID-funded Famine Early Warning Systems Network. FEWS NET II, as it is known, monitors food security and reports on such issues as food prices, climate and market flows.
Chemonics also holds a $126 million USAID contract for 2009 through 2014 for its Haiti-based Watershed Initiative for National Natural Environmental Resources (WINNER). Some of WINNER’s stated contract goals include increased agricultural productivity, strengthened watershed governance and reduced threat of flooding.
WINNER now has a new role of distributing Monsanto’s recent donation of 475 tons of hybrid corn and other vegetable seeds throughout Haiti. While this year’s seeds were free of charge, farming advocates familiar with Monsanto’s history around the world consider the donation a Trojan horse, with Monsanto seeking to gain a foothold in the Haitian market. The full extent to which Monsanto will now join Chemonics and American Rice as an economic beneficiary of the earthquake remains to be seen. Elizabeth Vancil of Monsanto gave “special thanks to USAID and USDA, who connected us to be able to secure this approval.” 
Meanwhile, Haitian peasant groups have declared this donation an affront to their seed sovereignty, a right they refer to as “the patrimony of humanity.”  Among other problems, they point to the calypso tomato seeds being treated with Thiram, a pesticide additive so toxic that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has banned its use for home gardeners in the US. On June 4, World Environment Day, more than 12,000 Haitian farmers and allies marched in a rural town and burned Monsanto seeds. In the US, solidarity groups from Chicago to Seattle did the same. Doudou Pierre, a leading food sovereignty advocate, said that the June 4 action was “a declaration of war.”
In March, Bill Clinton formally apologized for his role in having promoted the import of US rice into Haiti at the expense of Haitian farmers. “It may have been good for some of my farmers in Arkansas, but it has not worked. It was a mistake…. I had to live everyday with the consequences of the loss of capacity to produce a rice crop in Haiti to feed those people because of what I did; nobody else.” Mea culpa notwithstanding, nothing has changed in US foreign aid and trade policies.
As for the March rice harvest grown by Deronzil, Charles and other producers in the Artibonite, it finally sold in June for almost exactly two-thirds what it would have brought in before the earthquake, going for US $13.27 a sack instead of the pre-quake US $20.77.
“It’s not houses which will rebuild Haiti,” said Rosnel Jean-Baptiste of the national organization Heads Together Small Peasants of Haiti. “It’s investing in the agricultural sector.”
 A recent Associated Press article cited a 2005 government needs assessment which put the figure at 51 percent (Jonathan Katz, “With cheap imports, Haiti can’t feed itself,” Associated Press, March 20, 2010).
 Oxfam International, “Kicking Down the Door: How Upcoming WTO Talks Threaten Farmers in Poor Countries,” April 2005, p. 26.
 Oxfam International, Op. Cit., p. 26.
 USA Rice Federation, “USA Rice Efforts Result in Rice Food-Aid for Haiti,” January 20, 2010.
 Lisa McGowan, “Democracy Undermined, Economic Justice Denied: Structural Adjustment and the Aid Juggernaut in Haiti,” Development Group for Alternative Policies (The Development GAP), January 1997.
 USA Rice Federation, Op. Cit.
 Email from Elizabeth Vancil, Op. Cit.
 See, for example, the declaration of Chavannes Jean-Baptiste, director of the Peasant Movement of Papay, “Monsanto in Haiti?” distributed by email on May 14, 2010.
 Email from Elizabeth Vancil to Emmanuel Prophete, director of seeds at the Haitian Ministry of Agriculture, and others; released by the Haitian Ministry of Agriculture, date unavailable.
 Extension Toxicology Network, Pesticide Information Project of the Cooperative Extension Offices of Cornell University, Michigan State University, Oregon State University and University of California at Davis.
 Beverly Bell, “Groups Around the US Join Haitian Farmers in Protesting ‘Donation’ of Monsanto Seeds,” June 4, 2010.
 From a statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on March 10th, 2010. Jonathan M. Katz, “With cheap food imports, Haiti can’t feed itself,” Associated Press, March 20, 2010.