Skip to content Skip to footer

Kyrsten Sinema Exploring Federal Minimum Wage of $11, Lower Than Her Own State’s

Sinema is looking into raising the federal minimum wage to $11 an hour, but the minimum wage in her state is $12.15.

Senators Mitt Romney and Kyrsten Sinema speak to each other during a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing on March 5, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Arizona) is teaming up with Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) to form a bipartisan minimum-wage raise to counter the $15 federal minimum wage favored by progressives, the White House and the U.S. public. But the wage that Romney and Sinema are reportedly advocating for is lower than the minimum wage in Sinema’s own state.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) told HuffPost that the senators’ plan is to raise the federal minimum wage to $11 an hour. In Sinema’s home state of Arizona, however, the minimum wage is currently $12.15 an hour — higher than the threshold that Sinema is seeking to set federally.

Though neither Sinema nor Romney have confirmed that figure, Sinema has previously expressed her support for an $11 minimum wage. Manchin is reportedly circulating his own proposal for an $11 federal minimum wage indexed to inflation.

Romney has signaled to The Hill that he and Sinema were in agreement over what the proposal would be. “We’re negotiating a minimum wage proposal which we would ultimately take to our group of 20 and see how they react to it and then go from there,” he told the publication, referring to a group of 20 centrist senators.

The proposal stands in contrast to progressives’ proposal of slowly raising the minimum wage to $15 over the next few years. A $15 minimum wage has been a benchmark for progressives for almost a decade. Politicians like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) fought for the $15 minimum-wage proposal to be included in the last stimulus package, but it was eventually shot down.

Sanders has since continued fighting for raising the federal minimum wage to $15 by 2025 and phasing out of the subminimum wage that he calls for in his Raise the Wage Act proposal. “In the wealthiest country on Earth, people should not be working for starvation wages,” Sanders said last month. But centrists have continued standing staunchly against it despite months of prodding from the left.

Sinema gained the particular ire of progressives for her opposition to the proposal when she seemingly gleefully gave a thumbs down to the $15-wage proposal in the Senate last month. Raising the minimum wage to $15 by 2025, the Economic Policy Institute finds, would help raise the pay of 32 million workers in the U.S. — 21 percent of the workforce.

Polls have shown that in pushing for an $11 federal minimum wage instead of a $15 minimum wage, Sinema goes against the will of her own constituents.

Data for Progress found last month that 61 percent of Arizona voters support a $15 minimum wage, including an overwhelming 89 percent of Democrats — Sinema’s own party. That same poll found that 47 percent of voters said they’d be less likely to vote for Sinema over her opposition to the $15 minimum wage, including 60 percent of Democrats.

Progressives have pointed out to Sinema that her opposition to filibuster abolition or reform is also unpopular in her state. Over three in five Arizonan voters, a poll found in February, are more in favor of passing legislation than upholding the filibuster.

Though the $15 minimum wage has been a benchmark for the left for quite some time, many progressives have also pointed out that $15 an hour is barely a living wage in some places. Economist Robert Pollin recently told Truthout that if the minimum wage had stayed the same as it was in the 1960s, factoring in labor productivity and inflation, it would be $31.67 an hour today — over four times the current federal minimum wage of $7.25.

We lost 15 percent of our traffic overnight.

We now have three full months of data since Google changed its search to feature AI results. The numbers are worse than we anticipated. Overall readership that comes to Truthout through Google is down 54 percent against last year. The number of new readers who discover Truthout via Google searches is down 49 percent, and returning users from Google are down 51 percent.

We lost 15 percent of our readership overnight. This was a readership we painstakingly built over decades, and it vanished because Google chose corporate greed over a healthy democracy.

We anticipate a loss of roughly $500,000 in online revenue as a result of this massive traffic plunge in the next year alone.

The only way we can keep publishing is with strong reader support. We are asking you to start a monthly donation to Truthout today — anything you can do, whether $5 or $25, makes a difference.