Skip to content Skip to footer

Who Owns Tips? If Trump’s Department of Labor Gets Its Way, Employers, Not Workers

Transfer of money from workers up to their bosses is no small change.

Also See: Trump’s Labor Department Says Employees Don’t Own Their Tips

Thea Bryan is a single mother putting herself through graduate school. She spends her days at an unpaid internship for her social work program. At nights, she bartends to support herself, earning most of her income through tips. Sometimes, the pay is lucrative. But around October, her work — and money — started to lag. “When business is slow, as it has been for me lately, I don’t get paid. The managers get paid, the kitchen staff gets paid, the dishwasher gets paid. I don’t,” Bryan said.

As it stands, the lack of customers has already had a profound effect on her life. But a new proposal from the Department of Labor could make things much worse for Bryan. Under the proposed rule, she might have to hand those tips — the basis of her income — over to her bosses. The new Department of Labor proposal says that employers who pay tipped workers a full minimum wage (as opposed to the subminimum wage for tipped workers) would be able to take ownership of the tips that customers leave for their servers. This would overturn decades of precedent that keeps those tips in the hands of the people in the line of service, like Bryan.

Bryan shared her story at a press briefing put on by Restaurant Opportunities Centers (ROC) United on December 12. “Why is there such an effort to keep people from making decent wages?” Bryan asked. “First they don’t want to pay an decent hourly wage if you get tips, now they want to take your tips if you make a decent hourly wage!”

Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota joined Bryan at the press conference, both noting that the rule was another example of President Trump standing with the powerful against the interests of the people. One of those powerful groups? The National Restaurant Association, also known as “the other NRA.” Alongside the Department of Labor, the industry lobby is framing the proposed rule as an initiative to allow for tip pooling to end pay disparities between the front and back of the house.

What ROC United and other advocacy groups point out, though, is that there’s no provision to ensure that tips stay in the hands of workers and not their bosses. In fact, the language in proposal suggests that employers could allocate tips to make capital improvements or lower menu prices, which they say has “potential benefits to employees and the economy overall.” Or a tip left for a server could go to the employer instead.

That transfer of money from workers up to their bosses is no small change. If the rule is enacted, the Economic Policy Institute says that employers would take $5.8 billion in tips from workers, an estimate they call conservative. The backdrop to this is an industry that’s already rife with wage theft, which makes worker advocates especially concerned.

For example, employers of tipped workers are among the worst offenders in minimum wage violations, especially due to the subminimum tipped wage. Employers can pay tipped workers $2.13 an hour as long as their tips bring them up to the full minimum wage. But enforcement is lax — and that’s something Bryan knows from experience. She says she’s gone two weeks without getting paid a minimum wage, and hasn’t been able to get her employer to make up the difference.

Wage theft is also already an issue with tips, as ROC United co-director Saru Jayaraman pointed out at the press briefing. ROC United has surveyed nearly 10,000 restaurant workers, Jayaraman said, and one in five of them reported that employers have taken a portion of their tips, even though that’s currently not legal.

The Department of Labor is already feeling the pressure against this rule. Originally, they had planned to allow comments for 30 days beginning on December 5th — right through the holiday season, one of the busiest times of the year for restaurant workers. But Jayaraman said tens of thousands of people submitted comments against the rule in the first three days alone. The agency eventually extended the deadline to 60 days after public pressure, including a letter from more than 40 House Democrats calling for more time.

The battle over tips is only adding to Bryan’s stress over wages, which she says makes her feel like a pressure cooker. “My son is 11 years old. I would like to know how much money I will be making any given month so I can enroll him in after school activities and maybe take him to the movies every once in a while, or pay my rent.” Right now, she says that’s not possible for her.

That’s why Bryan’s not limiting her advocacy to the fight over owning tips. She’s also active in the One Fair Wage campaign in Washington, D.C. which calls for an end to the subminimum wage for tipped workers. Bryan says she’d like to see people in the service industry get a livable minimum wage, just like any other worker would expect. “I’m a restaurant professional, and I deserve a professional wage.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.