Skip to content Skip to footer

US Chamber of Commerce Dominates Undisclosed Spending in Congressional Races

The chamber has spent almost as much as the next two dark money groups combined, Public Citizen’s US chamber watch program finds.

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

Washington, D.C. – The US Chamber of Commerce is both the largest overall spender in the 2014 congressional elections among outside groups that do not disclose their contributors and the largest such spender in 28 of the 35 races in which it has gotten involved, Public Citizen reported today.

The Chamber has gotten involved in 16 of the 20 races that have seen the most outside spending, and it has spent an average of $908,000 per race, according to the new analysis, “The Dark Side of Citizens United,” conducted by Public Citizen’s US Chamber Watch program. Citizens United is the 2010 US Supreme Court ruling that permitted corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums to influence elections.

“When large corporations decide they want to get their own candidates into office but they don’t want to be seen doing it, they call the US Chamber,” said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division, which houses US Chamber Watch. “These politicians then push for anti-environmental, anti-consumer, and anti-health policies and priorities that hurt everyday Americans.”

Nearly all the US Chamber’s spending – about $31 million out of $32 million – has gone either to support Republicans or to oppose their Democratic opponents. The rest of the money was spent to oppose a handful of Republicans in primaries.

“We know that the Chamber gets most of its money from just a handful of large donors,” said Sam Jewler, communications officer for US Chamber Watch. “The policies its chosen candidates pursue will not represent Main Street, but will represent the agendas of a small number of very powerful companies that may prefer secretly buying influence over competing or innovating.”

As of Oct. 25, the Chamber had reported spending $31.8 million to influence this year’s congressional elections. Its nearest competitor, Crossroads GPS, had spent $23.5 million. The third-place group, the League of Conservation Voters, had spent less than $9.5 million.

Read Public Citizen’s report.

An important fundraising appeal: 9 Days to raise $50,000

Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. Today, as political censorship from the right intensifies, we have no choice but to ask for your help.

We are fundraising right now to cover our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work. Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support.