Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
California voters will soon decide whether to tax billionaires — but even if a majority says yes, the measure could still lose to either of two billionaire-funded measures designed to cancel it out.
The billionaire-backed group Building a Better California designed two countermeasures to undermine the wealth tax and create multiple ways to defeat it.
Recent polling shows slim majorities of likely voters support not just the wealth tax, Proposition 40, but also Propositions 41 and 42, the measures aimed at killing it, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.
“I don’t think that people at this point realize they’re direct countermeasures because there hasn’t been much said about 41 and 42,” said Mark Baldassare, polling director for PPIC.
Only one outcome can prevail. If Prop. 40 captures more votes than both 41 and 42, the wealth tax takes effect, voiding the countermeasures. If either 41 or 42 outpolls Prop. 40, the billionaire tax does not take effect.
What Each Measure Does
Prop. 40 would levy a one-time 5% tax on California residents whose net worth exceeds $1 billion. The tax would apply based on residency as of Jan. 1, 2026 — a date that had passed when the measure qualified for the ballot — meaning billionaires who left the state afterward would still owe it.
Most of the money generated would fund healthcare, while a smaller portion would go to education. Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, the primary proponent and financial backer of the measure, says the tax would raise about $100 billion and is needed to backfill federal healthcare cuts passed last year. Conservatives argue California’s Medi-Cal program has grown too expensive, and new federal policies will help the state cut back.
Prop. 41’s real target is Prop. 40: It would require new tax proposals passed after the start of this year to follow the state’s annual spending limit — a cap passed by voters in 1979 during a period of strong anti-tax sentiment that recent voter-approved special taxes have exempted themselves from. The billionaire tax would automatically violate this provision because it isn’t written to comply with the state spending limit.
Prop 41 would also require the nonpartisan state auditor to review new tax proposals before they reach voters and identify potential spending cuts in the programs they’d fund. If voters approve a tax, some of the revenue generated would pay for the audit; if a proposal fails, the state would be on the hook for the additional cost.
Prop. 42 would bar new taxes on personal property such as businesses, investments, retirement accounts, trusts and art collections — the exact things that Prop. 40 targets. It would also prohibit retroactive taxes, which would block a key part of Prop. 40: taxing wealth accumulated before the measure takes effect. Either provision alone is enough to nullify Prop. 40, if the wealth tax wins fewer votes than 41 or 42.
“Prop. 42 is a more direct anti-wealth tax proposal,” said Megan Jones, a tax attorney with Holland and Knight. The Legislature has tried unsuccessfully in the past to pass multiple wealth taxes, Jones said. If Prop. 42 passes, she said, it could limit lawmakers’ ability to try again in the future.
Who’s Funding the Fights
Backers of the billionaire tax — primarily SEIU-UHW — have raised about $31 million to pass the measure, mostly from union coffers. The California Democratic Party also supports the measure.
Gov. Gavin Newsom, along with doctors’ groups and clinics, opposes Prop. 40. Newsom argues the tax would not create a long-term solution to California’s budget woes and will drive wealthy people and businesses the state relies on through income taxes out of the state, further reducing revenue.
Sergey Brin, the Google co-founder, and other billionaires are bankrolling the opposition campaign, ploughing more than $56 million into the No on Prop. 40 committee through a political organization called Building a Better California. That same group is the primary financial backer for both Propositions 41 and 42, raising $131 million to campaign for those measures. In total, the billionaire-backed group has gathered more than $187 million to try to defeat Prop. 40.
Baldassare said the billionaire tax’s backers will have a difficult time overcoming voter confusion about the three competing measures.
Supported by the California Health Care Foundation (CHCF), which works to ensure that people have access to the care they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford. Visit www.chcf.org to learn more.
We lost 15 percent of our traffic overnight.
We now have three full months of data since Google changed its search to feature AI results. The numbers are worse than we anticipated. Overall readership that comes to Truthout through Google is down 54 percent against last year. The number of new readers who discover Truthout via Google searches is down 49 percent, and returning users from Google are down 51 percent.
We lost 15 percent of our readership overnight. This was a readership we painstakingly built over decades, and it vanished because Google chose corporate greed over a healthy democracy.
We anticipate a loss of roughly $500,000 in online revenue as a result of this massive traffic plunge in the next year alone.
The only way we can keep publishing is with strong reader support. We are asking you to start a monthly donation to Truthout today — anything you can do, whether $5 or $25, makes a difference.
