Skip to content Skip to footer

Sanders Says GOP Corporate Boycott Is Distraction From Voter Suppression Efforts

Sanders points out that the GOP’s complaints are spurious as they’ve given corporations tax break after tax break.

Sen. Bernie Sanders attends a confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on January 27, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

As Republicans criticize large corporations like Coca-Cola and Delta Air Lines for their opposition to the recent Georgia voter suppression law, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has called out the Republicans’ criticisms as “extraordinary” and says that they’re attempting to distract the public from their war on voting.

Sanders, speaking to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Monday, pointed out the hypocrisy of Republicans like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) suddenly and publicly criticizing corporations now that they’re not on his side of the voter suppression issue.

“Imagine that, after a trillion dollars of tax breaks for large corporations, lowering the corporate tax rate, after protecting the pharmaceutical industry for charging us, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs,” said Sanders, “Mitch McConnell and his friends are very upset that some corporations are now saying that it is an outrage that, in Georgia, they are trying to destroy Democracy.”

Sanders went on to say that the Republicans’ media circus over the corporations’ opposition to their bill is “nothing more than a deflection.” The Vermont senator said that Republicans like McConnell are simply trying to distract the public from the fact that the party has launched a coordinated effort across the country to suppress votes, especially those of people of color and poor people.

Organizations like Major League Baseball and many companies like Patagonia have denounced the new elections bill in Georgia, which makes it harder for people to vote and gives politicians more control over whose votes count. This has caused Republican leaders to begin speaking out against corporations and calling for boycotts of companies, even as they bear a large part of the responsibility for corporations’ continued outsized influence over American politics.

McConnell evidently thinks that the corporations are becoming too “woke” — but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t keep donating to the Republican Party. On Tuesday, McConnell said in a press conference, “my warning to corporate America is to stay out of politics,” but quickly added, “I’m not talking about political contributions.”

McConnell went on, saying that corporations donating to political action committees is “appropriate” but that they shouldn’t take a stance on political issues.

However, the two actions are inseparable — when a corporation donates to a politician or political party, they are implicitly supporting the views and goals of that party. Corporations had acknowledged as such when many of them announced they would be halting donations to Republicans who voted to overturn the results of the presidential election, even though several of them have already broken their pledges.

And, while corporations are publicly making statements opposing the Georgia law, some like Coca-Cola and Delta have previously either been supportive of or neutral toward the law. Meanwhile, corporations have funneled tens of millions to Republicans behind the attempts to suppress votes in Georgia and elsewhere across the country, so their public about-face isn’t likely to result in an actual reckoning.

It’s unlikely that Republicans’ boycotts of major brands will last long either — after all, as McConnell said, they need the cash from these companies in order to win elections and fight against progressive policy proposals. Over the years, Republicans have launched boycotts on a wide range of large companies: Walmart, Target, Netflix and Starbucks, among many others, but most of them have been fleeting.

McConnell has been a particular friend to corporations over the years, notably in his full-throated support of Citizens United. “If Mitch McConnell wants corporations to ‘stay out of politics’,” tweeted advocacy group Public Citizen, “he is going to be furious when he finds out about Citizens United.”

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision that gave corporations and other groups the power to spend unlimited money on influencing elections. The decision has given wealthy individuals and corporations huge amounts of sway over elections.

Opinions on how much money should be allowed to flow into politics is becoming a point of contention between Republicans and Democrats. Democrats have been pushing to get money out of politics via the election-reforming For the People Act. Republicans like McConnell, meanwhile, have long fought to keep money in politics — in part to pad their own pockets.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.