Skip to content Skip to footer

Rich Nations Aren’t “Paying Their Fair Share” to Mitigate the Climate Crisis

“Equity is not a moral or academic nicety, but a practical necessity in meeting the Paris goals,” the report said.

Activists attend the March for Climate which took place during COP24, the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, in Katowice, Poland, on December 8, 2018.

Rich countries—and the United States in particular—aren’t “paying their fair share” in terms of taking concrete actions to mitigate the global climate crisis, according to an independent review released at the COP24 talks in Poland, where world leaders are discussing how to meet the aims of the Paris agreement.

After Paris: Inequality, Fair Shares, and the Climate Emergency —produced by an international coalition of social movements, environmental and development organizations, trade unions, and various other groups—declares that “equity is not a moral or academic nicety, but a practical necessity in meeting the Paris goals.”

Although the Paris agreement’s primary objective—limiting global temperature rise within this century to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels — “requires profound action in developing countries that cannot realistically, or fairly, be expected without meaningful levels of international support,” the report concludes that wealthier countries aren’t taking bold enough steps, which will have worldwide implications without a change in course.

These nations—including the United States, the only country on the planet that no longer supports the Paris accord — “must urgently and dramatically deepen their domestic mitigation efforts,” the report charges. “If they are to contribute their fair shares to the common effort, they must also support additional actions outside their own borders.”

And it’s not just the richest nations that are failing. The report, which “draws attention not only to the inequality between countries, but also the inequality within countries, between the rich and the majority poor,” also asserts that “if we are to achieve the critical outcome of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C, the wealthy (individuals and companies) in all nations must take the greatest action to both reduce their own emissions and to support the global transition.”

The report is an indictment not only of the United States—which, under President Donald Trump, has rolled back climate regulations in favor of policies friendly to the fossil fuel industry—but also the European Union and the United Kingdom, which is working toward exiting the EU. It comes as the latest projections show planet-warming emissions hitting record levels in 2018, largely thanks to the polluting practices of the US, EU, China and India.

The key takeaway from the analysis is something that’s long been emphasized by climate campaigners. As Brandon Wu of ActionAid USA put it, “Unless there is a fair deal that accounts for the legacy of climate change caused by industrialized developed countries, we will never have a sustainable global strategy.”

“We have to get some trust back into the process,” Wu added, “and that starts with rich countries making much stronger commitments to fix the climate crisis that they, and their wealthiest elites, are largely responsible for creating.”

Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Rachel Kennerley concurred.

“The cost of climate transition must ultimately be paid by the people who have the money, this is true both within countries and between them, or billions will suffer,” she said. “We have one planet, we can act together now to save it, or be the generation that passively allowed species destruction on a truly terrifying scale.”

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $18,000 before midnight to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?