Skip to content Skip to footer

Republican Senator Says He’d Bite Teamster President in Fight

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders had to stop Sen. Markwayne Mullin from attacking a witness on Tuesday.

Sen. Markwayne Mullin talks with reporters in the U.S. Capitol as the Senate works on the debt limit bill on June 1, 2023.

After he had to be stopped from starting a physical fight in the United States Senate on Tuesday, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) doubled down on his threats toward Teamster President Sean O’Brien, saying he was still willing to fight him and blaming so-called “woke” politics for why an altercation didn’t happen in the supposed “upper house” of Congress.

While lawmakers in Congress often showcase their disdain for one another, and even toward witnesses in committee hearings, rarely does anything escalate to the point of something physical. The last known fistfight to occur in the Senate, for example, happened in 1902, demonstrating just how infrequent such altercations are.

Mullin and O’Brien confronted each other during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee meeting on Tuesday. When Mullin received use of the microphone, he read tweets from O’Brien, in which the Teamster suggested that he wanted to fight the senator at any point.

“Sir, this is a time, this is a place,” Mullin said, suggesting the two should fight right then and there. When Mullin stood up, seemingly getting ready to make things physical after a short back-and-forth between the two, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) interrupted, calling for them to stop and chiding Mullin directly.

“Oh, hold it. Is that your solution?” Sanders, the chair of the committee, scolded his Senate GOP colleague. “No, no, sit down. Sit down. You’re a United States Senator. Act like it.”

Although he did sit down after Sanders’s admonishment, Mullin doesn’t appear to want to take Sanders’s advice to heart. Appearing on Fox News and speaking to host Sean Hannity Tuesday night, Mullin provided dubious excuses for why he didn’t fight O’Brien in the Senate, blaming “political correctness” and so-called “woke” politics for why he couldn’t, rather than the fact that such an action would be considered deeply unbecoming for a senator and likely violate decorum rules.

During a subsequent podcast interview, Mullin, who is a former college wrestler and MMA fighter, also suggested he’d still be willing to fight O’Brien, utilizing unusual fighting styles — including biting, often considered by professional fighters to be a “dirty” form of combat — to best the Teamster president.

“I’m not afraid of biting. I will bite,” Mullin said.

When questioned by the befuddled podcast host if he really would, Mullin reiterated his willingness to stoop to such low levels.

“I’ll bite 100%. In a fight, I’m gonna bite. I’ll do anything. I’m not above it,” Mullin said. “And I don’t care where I bite by the way. It just is gonna be a bite.”

Mullin’s attempt to start a fight in the Senate halls came on the same day as a physical altercation occurred between two Republicans in the House. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-California), the former speaker of the House, reportedly elbowed Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tennessee) in the back and continued walking down the hallways of Congress as if nothing had occurred. Burchett, who was one of the eight Republicans who voted to oust McCarthy from the speakership, chased him down and questioned McCarthy over why he had hit him.

McCarthy denied doing so, even though an NPR journalist had witnessed the altercation happen.

Threats of violence and actual physical altercations emanating from Republicans this week are perhaps not to be unexpected, as a growing number of Republicans in the U.S. have indicated that they support the use of violence to help achieve their political ends. According to a Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) poll published late last month, fully 33 percent of Republican voters have said they believe political violence is justified in order to “put the country back on track.”

The poll also found that support for former President Donald Trump — whose words inspired a mob of his loyalists to attack the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and who, during past presidential campaigns, encouraged his supporters to physically fight dissenters — directly correlated to support for violence to achieve political goals. Two in five (41 percent) respondents in the PRRI poll who held a favorable view of Trump said they would back using violence to “correct” the country’s trajectory, while nearly half (46 percent) of those who wrongly believe the 2020 election was stolen said the same.

Notably, Mullin is himself a staunch supporter of Trump, being one of the first lawmakers in Congress to endorse Trump’s 2024 presidential election bid.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 8 days to add 460 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.