Skip to content Skip to footer
NYT’s David Sanger Scaremongering Iran Nukes Worse Than Netanyahu
David E. Sanger speaks at the Miller Center Forum, May 11, 2011. (Photo: Miller Center)

NYT’s David Sanger Scaremongering Iran Nukes Worse Than Netanyahu

David E. Sanger speaks at the Miller Center Forum, May 11, 2011. (Photo: Miller Center)

I’ve forgotten most of the Arabic I once knew. All I can remember now are a few colorful phrases, like “aktar maliki min il malik” – “more royalist than the King.”

Suppose that you decided that you wanted to scaremonger Iran’s nuclear program. An obvious question presents itself: Exactly how much should you scaremonger it? Suppose that you decided you wanted to run even with the world’s top-drawer Iran nuclear program scaremongers. You might reasonably think to yourself, well, surely the world’s preeminent Iran nuclear program scaremongers are Israeli government officials. If I scaremonger Iran’s nuclear program like Israeli government officials, no one’s going to accuse me of being an Iran nuclear program scaremonger patzer.

So, you check the press reports to catch up on the latest in Israeli government Iran nuclear program scaremongering:

Iran is on course to develop a nuclear bomb within six months, and time has run out for further negotiations, a senior Israeli minister said.

Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said Iran still believed it had room for maneuver in dealing with world powers, and that unless it faced a credible threat of US military action, it would not stop its nuclear activities.

“There is no more time to hold negotiations,” Steinitz, who is close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said in an interview with the Israel Hayom daily published on Friday.
“If the Iranians continue to run, in another half a year they will have bomb capability,” he said.

So, you might reasonably think to yourself, now I know what the gold standard is for scaremongering Iran’s nuclear program: Within six months they’ll have “bomb capability.” I have a hechsher from the highest authority.

But apparently, scaremongering like Israeli government officials just isn’t good enough for The New York Times’ David Sanger:

Unless a good deal of the current infrastructure is dismantled, Iran will be able to maintain a threshold nuclear capability – that is, it will be just a few weeks, and a few screwdriver turns, from building a weapon (my emphasis).

Now, I need you to sit down for this next part.

David Sanger provides no evidence for his assertion. I know! It’s shocking, isn’t it?

Sanger is being more royalist than the King, but he gives no evidence for his implied assertion that the King is falling behind in his support for the monarchy.

Back in March, President Obama said, “Right now, we think that it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually develop a nuclear weapon.” When did the US government assessment change to “just a few weeks”? I must have missed the memo!

You can write to The New York Times public editor here. You can Tweet her here. And you can tweet David Sanger here. My tweet to the public editor is here.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we only have hours left to raise over $9,000 in critical funds.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?