On the eve of the New York primary, Secretary Clinton and Sen. Sanders went at it tooth and claw in a CNN debate that may as well have been titled “CLINTON! (sanders),” thanks to CNN’s efforts. To wit: It was a demonstrably rigged game. The audience was packed with howling Clinton fans, and the moderators interrupted Sanders like they were getting paid an extra dollar every time they did it. Sanders: “Well I believe (‘Thank you, Senator’) we should (‘Thank you, Senator’) be (‘Thank you, Senator’) doing more (‘Your time is up, Senator’) for (‘Thank you, Senator’),” while Clinton was allowed to stemwind all she pleased. She invoked 9/11 exactly 43 seconds into the debate — I counted the ticks — and did so twice more again before the curtain came down. It was Sanders’ best debate performance to date, but it may be too late.
Simply put, if (when) Sanders loses New York, the clock will begin ticking toward his eventual withdrawal, and the “news” media will get the Clinton v. Trump contest they’ve been gibbering for (unless Cruz shoots the gap). If Sanders doesn’t win Pennsylvania next week, he risks being written off by the media as a mere protest candidate unworthy of consideration, and the Clinton campaign will be able to pivot to the general election. California isn’t until June.
Matters are far more funkadelic on the Republican side of the show. Ted Cruz did one of those insipid “Town Hall” things on MSNBC last night, hosted by the execrable Chuck Todd, and it made one wonder if a Donald Trump nomination might be preferable for the planet in general. Cruz is as smooth as quicksilver on a countertop, glib, engaging and deeply dangerous. Casting himself as the next Ronald Reagan, he flatly claimed that conquering the world is the essence of the United States, peddled the ridiculous flat tax idea and coughed up the Planned Parenthood fetal tissue sale canard. Todd’s reply to that last bit of nonsense? “We’ll be right back after these messages.”
The “Trump Inevitability” argument has taken a stout beating of late, especially after the Cruz campaign out-generaled Trump for delegates in Colorado and Louisiana, which inspired Trump to basically declare war on the RNC. Trump’s unprepared shoot-from-the-hip, I’m-so-good-I-don’t-have-to-try style lost him those delegates, and has even landed him in hot soup in Pennsylvania. Why? Football.
See, Pennsylvania is like Alabama when it comes to football. While the Steelers and Eagles reign supreme, the college teams are worshipped and adored. On Wednesday, Trump went to Pittsburgh and said, “I know a lot about Pennsylvania, and it’s great. How’s Joe Paterno?” The potential consequences of the rank laziness on the part of Trump’s campaign evinced in this requires, for those who don’t follow sports, a bit of explanation.
1.) Joe Paterno, the former 45-year God-coach of Penn State who was fired after a child sex scandal involving an assistant coach, died four years ago. It was in the papers.
2.) Trump was in Pittsburgh when he said this, home of the University of Pittsburgh and its own football program. They don’t give a damn about Joe Paterno, and by asking about him while holding a cheat sheet, it made Trump seem like he didn’t know where he was or didn’t care. Western part of Pennsylvania: pissed.
3.) The central part of Pennsylvania that Penn State calls home still worships Paterno, scandal be damned. Trump talked about Paterno as if he was still alive, which raised hackles from State College to Harrisburg to Ford City to Ridgburg. You don’t know JoePa died? Hell with you. There goes the center of the state.
If you want Pennsylvania, you know these things by rote. It was another example of the man not caring to understand the ground he was fighting for, and not giving a damn anyway. A sports reference may seem inconsequential in the main, but this is Pennsylvania and Paterno. Many elections have turned on a candidate blowing a sports reference and convincing the voters that he or she doesn’t know or doesn’t care about the region they covet.
To bring Tuesday’s vote back into it, this is the equivalent of campaigning in New York City without knowing which borough the Yankees play in. It matters, and Pennsylvania just got a lot more interesting thanks to Trump and a dead college football coach.
Yeah, it’s been a weird year and it’s fixing to get a whole lot weirder, especially on the Republican side. Three heavies in the New England GOP contingent — Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte and New Hampshire Rep. Frank Guinta — have already said they won’t be going to the convention. More are sure to follow as this mayhem unspools.
“It’s strange that words are so inadequate,” wrote TS Eliot. “Yet, like the asthmatic struggling for breath, so the lover must struggle for words.” I think, before this is over, we will all be struggling for the breath to find the words.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.