Skip to content Skip to footer

Jury Finds Derek Chauvin Guilty on All 3 Counts for Murder of George Floyd

Activists warned against declaring the decision “justice,” given that the violent policing system persists.

Protesters march in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota, near the courthouse calling for justice for George Floyd after closing arguments in the Derek Chauvin trial ended on April 19, 2021.

The jury has found former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin guilty of killing George Floyd, a Black man, after kneeling on his neck for several minutes.

The jury found Chauvin guilty on the charges of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for his role in Floyd’s death.

It’s unclear at this time whether Chauvin will attempt to appeal the decision, but legal experts consider it likely. A sentence for the guilty verdict has not yet been rendered.

The National Guard was deployed to the courthouse where Chauvin’s trial took place in anticipation of protests in response to Chauvin’s verdict, which some pointed out was itself an example of the very oppressive policing system to which protesters have been calling attention over the past year.

Though police are often able to avoid consequences for killing people, even if it’s on camera, activists warned against deeming the guilty verdict “justice,” which would in effect be celebrating the criminal legal system that has more often than not failed the very people most targeted by violent policing. A number of groups and activists issued a mix of emotions in response to the jury’s decision.

Reclaim the Block, an organization that describes itself as a “coalition to demand that Minneapolis divest from policing and invest in long-term alternatives,” reacted to the news with words about Floyd and Daunte Wright, another Black man who was killed by police this month in a suburb of Minneapolis.

“We love you George Floyd. We love you Daunte Wright. Our only wish today is that you were still here with us,” the organization wrote. “That’s our statement. That’s the work.”

Freelance multimedia journalist Samanta Helou-Hernandez took note of the police killings that occurred over the past several weeks, writing that, “while this trial was happening, U.S. law enforcement killed 64 people, including a 13 year old.”

Many pointed out that a guilty verdict wouldn’t end a long-upheld culture of impunity for police officers. And in fact, during their closing statements on Monday, the prosecution took a pro-police stance, saying that, “this is not a prosecution of the police” and that policing is “a most noble profession.”

“We’ve known Chauvin was guilty since the second we saw him murder George Floyd on film — but we also know of the racism inherent in our carceral and policing systems,” tweeted Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York). “This verdict doesn’t change that racism, or the work ahead needed to transform those systems to serve us.”

“Our hope is that this verdict will be a small step towards accountability. But that’s just about accountability, not justice,” wrote Rep. Cori Bush (D-Missouri). “For us, justice would be George Floyd alive today.”

Regardless of the guilty verdict, “it won’t do any more to deter other police from murdering people than the conviction of [Michael] Slager did,” wrote Bree Newsome Bass, an activist and artist, referring to the former South Carolina police officer who is serving a prison sentence for killing a Black man for running from a traffic stop in 2015.

Advocates have called, instead, for full police abolition in order to achieve true justice.

“[Former Brooklyn Center police officer Kim] Potter murdered Daunte Wright while the Chauvin trial was happening a few miles away. We need to defund and abolish policing,” Newsome Bass wrote.

“The grief and pain Black [Minnesotans] are experiencing will not go away with one verdict,” wrote former Minnesota state representative Erin Maye Quade. “We must dismantle white supremacy and build systems so every Minnesotan can live in safe and thriving communities, free from state violence and discrimination. That is justice.”

We need to update you on where Truthout stands this month.

To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.

To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.

We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.

Our fundraising campaign ends in a few hours, and we still must raise $11,000. Please consider making a donation before time runs out.