A judge in New York has ruled that defamation claims against Rudy Giuliani and several Fox News personalities can move forward, noting that there appeared to be evidence that those individuals “acted with actual malice” against an elections technology company.
That business, Smartmatic, has filed a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News and several of its employees. The lawsuit also alleged that lawyers who previously worked for former President Donald Trump, including Giuliani, acted irresponsibly when they spread misinformation about the company’s practices during the 2020 presidential election.
Fox News personalities, as well as Trump’s former lawyers, wrongfully claimed that Smartmatic had rigged election machines to benefit now-President Joe Biden, and that the company had done so with the help of Venezuelan government officials — claims that have no basis in truth whatsoever.
Dozens of claims from Trump allies, alleging election fraud by Smartmatic and other actors, have been debunked and dismissed.
The lies pushed by these individuals, Smartmatic said in its lawsuit, resulted in “catastrophic damage” to the company’s reputation.
Justice David Cohen of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan issued his ruling on Tuesday. Although the lawsuit can move forward against Fox News and the two personalities who spread the falsehoods — Maria Bartiromo and former anchor Lou Dobbs — Cohen dismissed claims Smartmatic brought forward against Jeanine Pirro, ruling that she had issued a misstatement against the company on the air and that she hadn’t purposefully spread falsehoods. Cohen also dismissed claims against former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, noting that the court didn’t have jurisdiction to rule on her actions.
Cohen also dismissed some of the claims made against Giuliani in the lawsuit — but noted that his decision to do so was based on a technicality, and emphasized that Smartmatic could still press forward with defamation claims against him.
Giuliani “acted with actual malice insofar as he evinced a reckless disregard for the truth,” Cohen said, adding that Smartmatic could try to file another lawsuit against him if they wanted to.
Regarding the aspects of the lawsuit that were allowed to move forward, Cohen said there was a “substantial basis” to argue that Fox News had “turned a blind eye” to “outrageous claims” its anchors were making about Smartmatic, which were “so inherently improbable that it evinced a reckless disregard for the truth.”
Fox News said that it plans to appeal the judge’s findings.
Giuliani, in his role as Trump’s personal lawyer after the 2020 election, pushed several falsehoods and made numerous unsubstantiated claims about the integrity of the outcome of the race. In addition to many defamation claims being made against him, Giuliani has also been accused of taking part in the plot orchestrated by the Trump campaign to use fake electors to disrupt the counting of Electoral College votes that took place on January 6, 2021.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.