One year ago, in an inaccuracy-laden speech in the Rose Garden, President Trump announced his intention to pull the US out of the Paris climate agreement. The announcement shook international climate politics to its core, leading many to question whether international momentum on climate change would grind to a halt.
In response, a groundswell of non-federal leaders has emerged, vowing to support the goals of the Paris agreement despite the actions of the federal administration. Governors Jerry Brown of California, Jay Inslee of Washington State and Andrew Cuomo of New York launched the US Climate Alliance, which now has 17 member states. Meanwhile, US businesses, universities and local governments launched the “We Are Still In” coalition, which now has more than 2,700 members.
The growing sub-national climate movement has been welcomed as providing much-needed counterbalance to the inactions of the Trump administration. Still, during the latest round of UN climate talks in Bonn, Germany, tension rose over one significant oversight. While US business, city and state pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions were laudable, the sub-national movement was not working to address the gap in funding to developing countries that the Trump administration opened.
When Trump pulled out of the Paris climate agreement, the administration also abandoned the US’s pledge to the Green Climate Fund (GCF) — a key channel for international climate finance, which helps developing countries adapt to climate change and pursue low-carbon and climate resilient development. The US had pledged $3 billion in 2014 and, under Obama, had delivered only one-third of that pledge. As such, Trump’s actions have left a $2 billion gap that will limit the important work of the GCF and leave those most vulnerable to climate change without support.
To fill that gap, the We Are Still In Coalition and US Climate Alliance have pledged approximately $0. The closest thing to action came from Massachusetts, which is attempting to establish a fund to help least developed countries, and Seattle, which passed a resolution I helped write, recognizing not just the responsibility to reduce carbon emissions, but also to address the gap in climate finance. But now, Seattle leaders say they’re not willing to act unless others act with them. So far, the response from the rest of the “We Are Still In” movement has been silence.
Some non-federal government officials claim that they don’t have the money, but if leaders within the richest country and biggest polluter on Earth are not willing to pay, then how can we fairly ask the poorest countries to pay to reduce their emissions?
The least developed countries, which are least responsible for causing climate change yet most vulnerable to its impacts, must be watching in disbelief. While the US ignores its climate debt to the developing world, 11 relatively wealthy US cities and counties that are among the largest emitting jurisdictions in the world have launched legal cases claiming climate reparations from fossil fuel companies.
While I hope they win their justified lawsuits, if they do so without also addressing their own climate debt, climate justice will be turned somewhat on its head.
The Paris climate agreement recognizes that developed countries, which have emitted more than their fair share of carbon emissions, have a moral responsibility to not only reduce their emissions, but also to help those who are impacted by their emissions both to adapt to climate change and to pursue resilient low-carbon development. With the Trump administration’s immoral behavior, that responsibility now falls to those who claim they are “still in.”
In a few months, leaders from the burgeoning US sub-national climate movement are meeting in San Francisco at the Global Climate Action Summit, a summit meant to celebrate and spur on sub-national climate action. If they meet without addressing international climate finance, they will abdicate their moral responsibility to help those who are harmed by the US’s carbon pollution. If they are really “still in” the Paris climate agreement, then it’s time they showed us the money.
Note: A version of this article appears in the journal Ethics, Policy & Environment.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.