The House of Representatives advanced two bills on Wednesday that would expand presidential influence over the federal rulemaking process.
One piece of legislation would subject independent agency draft regulations to White House review — through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Another would create a board, composed of presidential appointees, “to determine if a rule or set of rules should be repealed.”
Both proposals advanced roughly along party lines through the Republican-controlled body. No less than a dozen members on both sides crossed the aisle on the review board vote. Seven Democrats joined Republicans to approve of the OIRA measure.
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, had harsh words for the proposals, in reports published last month by the panel.
“A primary concern with subjecting independent agencies to OIRA review of rulemakings is that those agencies are designed to be independent,” he said, “and therefore not subject to political review of their regulatory actions by the White House.”
Cummings said that the proposed review board would “prioritize corporate profits over the health and safety of the American public,” and cost the taxpayers $30 million to boot.
Unlike executive agencies, independent agencies are run by a board of appointed commissioners. Their leaders don’t serve in the Presidential Cabinet, unlike department secretaries.
Most independent agencies also, by law, require the president to appoint board members or commissioners on a bipartisan basis, ensuring dissenting views are already baked into their rulemaking processes.
Many financial regulatory agencies are considered independent, including: the Federal Reserve, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
So, too, are other significant technical economic regulators, including: the Federal Communications Commission, the National Labor Relations Board and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In the committee report on the OIRA reform bill, Republicans argued that Democrats have wanted the legislation passed, when they controlled the White House. In their case, they cited former Obama White House officials and an executive order from 2011.
“Numerous regulatory experts have recommended that OIRA’s review extend to independent agencies,” said House Oversight Committee chair Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).
A relatively obscure office, OIRA is rather influential, reviewing every executive agency’s draft “major rules” before they are published in the Federal Register.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) oversees OIRA. President Trump’s pick to run OMB is former Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), a far-right policymaker who once voted to declare Social Security and Medicare unconstitutional.
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we have just 5 days left to raise $40,000 in critical funds.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?