Skip to content Skip to footer

GOP States Gutting Unemployment Didn’t Bring Workers Back Faster, Study Shows

A “meaningful” number of Americans suffered as a result of unemployment cuts, said one of the authors of the study.

A Now Hiring sign is displayed in front of a restaurant in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, on March 19, 2022.

A new study has revealed that Republican-run states prematurely ending unemployment benefits last year did not have a significant impact on getting people back to work, as GOP lawmakers claimed it would — but it did result in financial hardship for millions of Americans.

In the summer of 2021, as many areas of the country were dealing with a supposed “worker shortage,” several Republican-led states’ governors decided to end extended federal unemployment benefits that included weekly increases to the typical insurance payment. The move affected some 4.1 million unemployed workers in the 25 states that ended the program, which had been initiated in response to the economic downturn brought on by the coronavirus pandemic.

Republican governors justified ending the benefits by arguing that the additional unemployment benefits disincentivized workers from returning to their jobs. In reality, the so-called “worker shortages” were likely due to workers wanting to return to jobs that provided better pay and benefits than many employers were willing to give.

The move to prematurely end the extended unemployment benefits seemed to have had little, if any, effect on getting people back to work, according to a paper published last week by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. In states that ended the unemployment benefits, hiring did pick up at a faster pace, on average — but the rate difference, when compared to states that didn’t end extended unemployment benefits, is incredibly miniscule.

The states that ended the benefit early only saw a hiring rate difference of 0.2 percent compared to other states, the study found — a difference that is “pretty much imperceptible,” said Robert Valletta, associate director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and co-author of the paper.

Put another way, for every 1,000 people that were hired in states that kept the unemployment benefits in place, 1,002 people were hired in states that removed the benefits — hardly the significant change that GOP lawmakers promised would come from ending the benefits.

At the same time, Valletta added, a “meaningful fraction of people suffered real hardship as a result” of the cuts. Among the millions of Americans who saw their unemployment insurance curtailed, the average worker lost around $6,000 in benefits compared to workers in states that kept them intact.

Progressive lawmakers, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), largely rejected conservatives’ claims that unemployment insurance benefits were hurting businesses seeking workers. Even if that was the case, Sanders said, it wouldn’t justify ending the extended benefits.

If such benefits were “preventing employers from hiring low-wage workers there’s a simple solution,” Sanders said in the spring of 2021. “Raise your wages. Pay decent benefits.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.