Everyone understands that when you go into a negotiation you have to make trade-offs. No one expects to get everything on their wish list. For this reason, no one should have been surprised that Donald Trump wasn’t able to run the table when he met with China’s President Xi Jinping last month, but they might be surprised at what he apparently gave up.
A central theme of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign was that our trade negotiators were stupid and that they had negotiated rotten trade deals. He claimed this was the cause of the country’s $500 billion-plus trade deficit (a bit less than 3 percent of GDP).
In particular he singled out our trade deals with China, the country with whom we have the largest trade deficit. He called China a “world class currency manipulator.” He vowed that he would declare China a currency manipulator the day he took office and follow up with punitive measures. He was going to force China to raise the value of its currency against the dollar.
During the campaign Trump apparently felt China’s currency management was an important issue. He raised the point repeatedly at his rallies. He also raised it during the presidential debates.
It is also worth noting that China does in fact manage its currency. (“Manage” is a more accurate word than “manipulate.” China’s interventions in currency markets are mostly public knowledge. We don’t have to catch them doing something in the middle of the night.) China’s central bank acquired trillions of dollars of US assets and other reserve currencies in the last decade. More recently, the country has put more than $1 trillion into a sovereign wealth fund that holds assets in other countries. These measures have the effect of propping up the dollar against the Chinese yuan.
While China is no longer buying up reserves, it still holds more than $4 trillion, counting the sovereign wealth fund. These huge holdings act to keep down the value of the yuan against the dollar.
Trump could have negotiated with President Xi to go on a path of gradually raising the Chinese yuan against the dollar. According to many accounts, this is consistent with China’s plans anyhow. The goal in reducing the trade deficit would simply be raising the value of the yuan somewhat more quickly and perhaps by a somewhat larger amount than China would raise it on their own.
But Trump chose to drop the currency issue. According to his own account, he developed a great rapport with President Xi. Rather than upset Mr. Xi by talking about currency, he is counting on China’s assistance in controlling the nuclear threat posed by North Korea.
This story is really kind of shocking. After all, it is hardly a secret that North Korea is now a nuclear power that cannot be counted on to act responsibly with its weapons (i.e. not use them). It also is well-known that China is by far North Korea’s most important ally.
In short, there is no excuse for a person running for president not to realize that he would need China’s assistance in dealing with North Korea. But apparently, this was news to Donald Trump. And, if the issue is whether to engage in a nuclear war with North Korea or drop demands against China on its currency, it’s understandable that Trump or anyone else would decide avoiding nuclear war is more important.
But the amazing part is how Trump could just now be learning of China’s importance for controlling North Korea and why he didn’t have a strategy for negotiating on currency that took this into account. As with health care, taxes and so many other areas, President Trump is just now finding out what almost everyone else already knew — things can be complicated.
The failure to address currency issues means that Trump is putting on hold his promises to manufacturing workers in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and elsewhere that he would get back their jobs by bringing down the trade deficit. For now at least, Trump has little on the table that offers much hope of a lower trade deficit.
Although the laid off workers may still be left out in the cold, Trump’s negotiations with President XI did seem to offer some real dividends. His daughter, Ivanka Trump, was awarded several trademarks for her clothing brand in China. She had been trying to secure these trademarks for a considerable period of time, so she was undoubtedly quite pleased that the approval happened to come through when her father was meeting with President Xi.
So US workers may not be doing so great in Donald Trump’s United States, but things seem to be going well for Donald Trump and his family.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.