Skip to content Skip to footer

Congress Has “Moral Obligation” to Impeach Alito, Thomas, AOC Says in Speech

“Corruption, without consequence, infects all it touches,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attends an event in New York on March 23, 2024.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) slammed Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in a speech on Wednesday, saying it is vital that they be impeached after the two have committed innumerable “abuses of power” that have helped lead the country down a dark path.

Speaking on the House floor as she introduced articles of impeachment against the justices, Ocasio-Cortez warned that the deep corruption on display by both justices “infects all it touches” and must be stopped by Congress.

“For the good of the institution and the nation, absent resignation, they must be removed. The proof is undeniable,” said Ocasio-Cortez. “Reasonable Americans will and do believe that Justices Thomas and Alito are prone and subjected to corruption, that the institution failing to punish them is broken, and that consequently, their impeachment is a constitutional imperative and our congressional duty.”

The type of violations committed by the justices represent grave threats to democracy and are exactly why the concept of impeachment was established, she said.

She laid out the evidence against the justices backing her impeachment attempt, highlighting only the most egregious violations exposed over the past years, like Thomas’s decades of accepting at least over $1.5 million in gifts from right-wing billionaire Harlan Crow and refusal to recuse himself from cases that Crow has had before the Court. Crow and Thomas, she noted, only became close after Thomas was appointed to the Court.

“Would a reasonable American question that receiving lavish gifts from Mr. Crow might lead Justice Thomas to have a bias towards his, quote, friend with business before the court? Without a doubt, yes. But did Justice Thomas recuse? No,” she said.

Meanwhile, Thomas’s refusal to recuse from cases related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol despite his wife’s role in organizing the day’s events represents “one of the most shocking examples of conflict of interest in the Court’s history.”

On Alito, she brought up his refusal to recuse from a case involving his billionaire benefactor Paul Singer, netting Singer $2.4 billion, or refusal to recuse from cases surrounding the 2020 election despite flying a flag in solidarity with pro-Donald Trump Christian nationalists after the January 6 attempted coup.

“Would a reasonable person question that Justice Alito’s conduct exhibits and demonstrates reasonable concern for bias in these cases? Absolutely, and without question,” she said.

Ocasio-Cortez’s impeachment filing is the strongest response yet to Supreme Court malfeasance, and comes amid a string of extremist decisions made in the last years seeking, as the bench’s right-wing benefactors wish, to overhaul the U.S. government and concentrate power in conservative institutions. The Court has made many decisions overturning decades-old precedents or taking up cases entirely lacking standing in order to erode Americans’ rights or attack left-leaning regulatory powers.

These decisions are undoubtedly related to Alito and Thomas’s ties to major dark money networks that have waged campaigns for many years to have decisions like Roe v. Wade overturned, as Ocasio-Cortez pointed out.

“We cannot ignore and pretend that this corruption is wholly unrelated to the millions of pregnant Americans now suffering and bleeding out in emergency rooms under the court’s unleashing of extreme abortion bans across the United States,” she said. “Nor can we ignore the millions of Americans now suffering hours long wait times in the hot sun, often without water, just to cast a ballot, also a direct result of this corrupt court’s gutting of the Voting Rights Act.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy