HHS secretary Alex Azar refused to guarantee a coronavirus vaccine would be affordable to all during Congressional testimony on Wednesday. The outrage reminded Americans why they are sick and tired of the unchecked pharmaceutical industry’s abuses. As we wrote for the American Prospect, Azar is a former pharma lobbyist who, like the rest of President Trump’s coronavirus response team, has no background in public health or research.
Yet Trump might not be alone in trusting unqualified pharmaceutical executives with policy decisions. The Revolving Door Project has found 2020 candidates Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg are both accepting significant donations from the pharmaceutical industry. The rallying of donations around these two candidates indicates the industry is already placing bets to install its allies in key positions across the next administration and minimize government oversight on, say, lowering drug prices.
Biden is currently the Democratic candidate with the highest donations from the pharmaceuticals and health products industry, second only to President Trump. His ties to pharma run deep: Biden’s campaign chairman is Steve Richetti, a former lobbyist for pharmaceutical companies Novartis, Eli Lilly and Sanofi. The latter two corporations are currently embroiled in a class action lawsuit over accusations of fixing insulin prices. Biden also chose a former senior VP from Pfizer, Greg Simon, to lead his Biden Cancer Initiative. On the campaign trail, Biden came under fire for praising pharma when speaking about the initiative to donors.
Like many moderates on the 2020 trail, Biden’s most recent fundraising events required a $2,800 campaign donation to gain entrance. His new donors included Jon Selib, a VP of global policy at Pfizer, and Ercument Tokat, a partner at Centerview who has advised Pfizer, Wyeth, Celgene.
Several of Biden’s finance industry backers also boast ties to pharmaceuticals. Billionaire David Bonderman, the chairman of private equity firm TPG Capital and board member of Kite Pharma, maxed out his contributions to the Biden primary campaign. John Vogelstein, a partner at Warburg Pincus which invested in Vertice Pharma, also donated the $2,800 maximum. Venture capitalist David Scheer, who sits on the board of pharmaceutical companies including Esperion Therapeutics, OraPharma, and ViroPharma (which the FTC slammed with a complaint in 2017 for delaying generic competition to one of its drugs), has raised at least $25,000 for Biden. This makes him a campaign “bundler,” or high-dollar volunteer fundraiser. Alan Blinken, the former Clinton ambassador to Belgium and board member of biopharmaceutical company UCB, is also a Biden bundler.
Buttigieg follows Biden in the race for pharma and health products donors, with contributions from executives at Pfizer, Bayer and Eli Lilly. Pfizer chief corporate affairs officer Sally Susan donated $2,800 to the Buttigieg campaign. Chief medical officer Kevin Williams donated $1,000, and former Pfizer general counsel Louis Ramos donated $2,820.
Buttigieg’s funders also include Thaddeus Burns, the head of government affairs at pharmaceutical company Merck Life Sciences. Burns donated $6,300 to Buttigieg’s campaign (slightly overstepping the legal maximums) and hosted a fundraiser for him in Geneva. Merck paid out over $950 million in 2011 for illegally marketing a drug for uses the FDA didn’t approve. From 1999 to 2007, Burns worked for lobbying firm Akin Gump. There, he schmoozed on behalf of pharma industry clients including Merck, Pfizer, Human Genome Sciences, and Wyeth.
Influential executives at the pharma giant Bayer are also cozying up to Buttigieg. Their senior director of international government affairs and registered pharma lobbyist Jim Travis contributed $2,800 to the campaign, while frequent Bayer counsel and Wilkinson Walsh partner Alexandra Walsh contributed $4,250.
Buttigieg also took money from executives at Eli Lilly, based in his home state of Indiana. Former Indianapolis mayor Bart Peterson, who is the Eli Lilly head of government relations (read: lobbying), contributed $5,000 to the campaign. Chief Financial Officer Joshua Smiley also donated $2,800, and public relations head Jennifer Scroggins donated $1,000.
Biden and Buttigieg’s influx of pharmaceutical money doesn’t bode well for their campaign promises to reign in the industry. All of that campaign cash doesn’t come for free. Expect pharma giants to come knocking when Biden or Buttigieg start filling crucial executive branch roles overseeing the health sector, thus allowing these companies to continue harming consumers.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.