The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will not air the last episode of a six-part documentary that focuses on wildlife on the British Isles, reportedly over fears that doing so would have upset conservative interests in the United Kingdom.
David Attenborough’s documentary on British wildlife will air its first five episodes on BBC One during primetime hours. But the final part of the series, which focuses on environmental issues and the decline of nature in the U.K. over the past several decades, will only be available on the BBC’s iPlayer streaming service.
In addition to noting how wildlife has dwindled over the years, the sixth episode will also feature discussions of “rewilding” — a movement to restore and protect natural processes in former wilderness areas — a concept that is controversial within the U.K.’s Conservative Party.
The network made the decision in part because of fears of “lobbying groups that are desperately hanging on to their dinosaurian ways,” one source familiar with the choice told The Guardian. Senior sources from the BBC also told the publication that the decision was made to quell potential critiques from conservative voices in the country.
Laura Howard, a producer of the program, which is entitled “Wild Isles,” suggested that worries over politics in the documentary were unfounded — asserting that the “facts” included in the entire docuseries “speak for themselves” outside of any political ideology.
“It is undeniable, we are incredibly nature-depleted. And I don’t think that that is political,” Howard said. “I think it’s just facts.”
The BBC insists that it is not censoring Attenborough’s documentary. Rather, according to one spokesperson discussing the matter, the sixth episode is considered to be a standalone documentary, unrelated to the first five parts, and thus is being placed elsewhere for viewing.
But critics say the last installment of Attenborough’s work, all of which was commissioned by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the World Wildlife Fund, should air on television, the same as the other five parts of the program will do.
“For the BBC to censor [Attenborough], one of the nation’s most informed and trusted voices on the nature and climate emergencies is nothing short of an unforgivable dereliction of its duty to public service broadcasting,” said Caroline Lucas, a Green Party Member of Parliament.
“So the BBC is now effectively censoring the voice of nature David Attenborough on factual and vital content based on the potential reaction from Tory MPs and right-wing newspapers. These are truly dark days,” opined Liam Thorp, the political editor for Liverpool Echo.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy