As details emerge surrounding the boxes of documents that the FBI uncovered at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, far right Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) has called for a repeal of the Espionage Act, a law that federal officials may use to prosecute Trump.
On Saturday, Paul wrote in a tweet that the Espionage Act — which is used to prosecute spies and those who gather and refuse to return sensitive information that relates to national defense — is an “egregious affront to the 1st Amendment” and that it has been “abused from the beginning to jail dissenters of WWI.”
Free speech advocates have long called for reforms to the Espionage Act, as the World War I-era law has been used to prosecute whistleblowers, including figures like Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, who have leaked information about American war crimes perpetrated by the military abroad.
However, the timing of Paul’s tweet, just a few days after the FBI search, suggests that he may be calling for the repeal of the Espionage Act due to Trump’s potential legal troubles in relation to the top secret documents that he smuggled to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office. Holding onto classified documents — and concealing them from federal investigators — is illegal.
Paul has been outspoken against the FBI’s search. “The FBI raid on President Trump was approved by Director [Chris] Wray,” Paul wrote on Twitter shortly after the raid. “Today’s raid is outrageous and unjust, but predictable.” Trump had appointed Wray to lead the FBI when he took office, but their relationship eroded when Trump began to believe that Wray was not sufficiently loyal to him.
If Trump is indeed charged under the Espionage Act, it would be the first time that a president has faced scrutiny under that law.
Paul’s call to repeal the Espionage Act came as other Republicans were loudly condemning the investigation, claiming that it is politically motivated, though commentators have said that failing to investigate the documents would be the truly politically motivated move. Legal experts say that the FBI has been relatively soft on Trump throughout the investigation.
Still, far right Republicans have called for the FBI to be defunded and replaced with an agency that is controlled by the far right.
Like the calls to defund the FBI, experts say that there is weight to Paul’s call to abolish the Espionage Act. But if such demands are motivated by bad faith views, the laws or agencies that the right wing calls to abolish could be replaced with institutions that even further favor the far right.
In this case, it seems as though Paul is likely joining his fellow GOP lawmakers in calling for impunity for Trump, as the party has done for over a year in relation to his role in inciting the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
Government watchdogs and advocates for democracy have indeed called for Trump to be prosecuted for trying to overturn the 2020 election or for a variety of other crimes that he appears to have committed, but the right has doggedly lined up behind Trump to ensure that he doesn’t face consequences. After all, Senate Republicans voted against convicting Trump during both of his impeachment proceedings, despite massive amounts of evidence against him.
Meanwhile, Trump’s most loyal followers have responded to the FBI search by threatening violence and calling for civil war. One Trump loyalist executed an attack on an FBI office in Cincinnati, Ohio, demonstrating that some right-wingers are willing to enact violence if Trump faces penalties for his behavior.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.