Skip to content Skip to footer

A New Trump Proposal Threatens Insurance Coverage Through HealthCare.gov

If finalized, the rule would encourage privatization of core functions of health insurance marketplaces.

A demonstrator holds a sign in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on November 10, 2020.

A proposed Trump Administration rule would undermine the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and could cause many people to lose health coverage. If finalized, the Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (NBPP) for the 2022 coverage year would encourage privatization of core functions of the health insurance marketplaces, starve HealthCare.gov of needed funds, codify Administration efforts to waive important parts of the ACA, and continue a policy that raises premiums and cost-sharing. Comments on the rule are due December 30 and can be submitted here.

Encourages Privatization of HealthCare.gov Functions

The proposed rule doubles down on the Administration’s November 1 approval of Georgia’s marketplace privatization waiver by letting any state follow suit without a waiver. Under Georgia’s 1332 waiver (named after section 1332 of the ACA), the state will leave HealthCare.gov and require its marketplace enrollees to enroll exclusively through private web brokers or insurers.

This scheme will reduce coverage among the 500,000 Georgians who now enroll through HealthCare.gov, without a broker. For starters, many people will likely fall through the cracks in this massive change due to confusion about the new process. That’s what happened in states that shifted from the federal marketplace to a state-based marketplace or vice versa, a transition much simpler for consumers than what Georgia is attempting.

Also, consumers will lose access to HealthCare.gov’s apples-to-apples plan comparisons. Instead, they’ll have to rely on profit-driven entities, which can withhold essential information (like premiums and deductibles) for plans that don’t pay them commissions, forcing consumers to do significant legwork if they want to explore those options. And these entities sometimes steer people to short-term and other subpar plans and discourage Medicaid enrollment.

By encouraging more states to follow Georgia’s lead, the NBPP would likely cause more loss of coverage and divert more people to subpar plans.

The NBPP would also encourage enrollment assisters and navigators to use enhanced direct enrollment (EDE) websites – websites from private brokers authorized to directly enroll people in marketplace plans – instead of HealthCare.gov and let EDE websites operate for up to a year without meeting marketplace requirements for presenting materials in languages other than English.

Proposes Additional Harmful Changes

The NBPP also would:

  • Cut funding for HealthCare.gov. The NBPP would slash, by 25 percent, the user fee on insurers that helps fund HealthCare.gov operations. This would compromise support for the enrollment website and call center, marketing, outreach, and enrollment assisters, potentially reducing enrollment and undermining customer service ― which could push more states to privatize their marketplaces.
  • Promote state deviations from ACA protections. The NBPP would codify parts of 1332 guidance from 2018, which weakens consumer protections by opening the door to waivers that would promote enrollment in short-term plans that lack the ACA’s protections for people with pre-existing conditions, as well as waivers that would reduce benefits or increase deductibles and cost-sharing. The guidance likely violates the ACA’s statutory “guardrails,” which prevent 1332 waivers from reducing coverage or making coverage less comprehensive or less affordable, but codifying it as a rule would make it harder for the incoming Biden Administration to immediately roll it back.
  • Continue a policy that raises premiums and cost-sharing. The Administration’s 2019 change in the formula used to calculate premium tax credits, which cut financial assistance for millions of people, would continue under the NBPP. And it would have an even greater impact in 2022, raising premiums by 4.7 percent for most subsidized marketplace consumers after accounting for their tax credits (compared to about 2.7 percent this year). That amounts to a $360 annual premium increase for a family of four with $80,000 in income. The same formula change also increases the limit on consumers’ total out-of-pocket expenses, which applies to both marketplace and employer plans. In 2022, that limit will be $400 higher for an individual, and $800 higher for families, than if the 2019 change were reversed.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy