More than a dozen states joined together on Monday to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration, following an announcement last week from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stating that international students could be deported if universities allowed them to utilize online-only options for their education.
Students could be impacted if the university itself goes online-only, or if they individually choose to create a schedule that is solely online. Such decisions are being considered in order to curb or prevent the spread of coronavirus on campus.
ICE’s moves last week, however, could force international students to make a difficult choice: return to the classrooms and risk exposure to the disease, or go online-only and be forced to leave the country.
Universities across the country may be stuck with a catch-22: reopen classrooms to ensure international students can remain in the U.S. while risking greater exposure to the disease, or keep utilizing distance learning in order to protect the health of students and faculty with the possibility some students could be deported as a result.
These decisions could have enormous impacts, as the U.S. grants more than one million student visas to international students every year. International students also tend to pay higher tuition fees, and public universities, particularly in the last few decades, have been upping the proportion of both international and out-of-state admissions as a way to cover for the revenue gaps left by the defunding of education by the federal government. As such, the ICE policy could be seen as a way of putting economic pressure on public universities to physically reopen.
In response to ICE’s announcement, 17 states plus the District of Columbia announced on Monday that they would be suing the Trump administration over the matter. The argument, according to those states’ attorneys general, is that the decision to revoke the visas of international students was made in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, which deals with decision-making processes within federal agencies.
The litigants’ case may stand on some pretty solid foundation, considering that the same act was cited in a Supreme Court decision on a separate immigration last month. In a 5-4 decision from the Court, justices found the Trump administration had violated the Administrative Procedure Act when they had attempted to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who is spearheading the coalition of states suing the administration, chastised the White House for providing little-to-no justification for why international students had to be deported if their classes went online.
“The Trump Administration didn’t even attempt to explain the basis for this senseless rule, which forces schools to choose between keeping their international students enrolled and protecting the health and safety of their campuses,” Healey said in a statement.
The states’ lawsuit isn’t the only legal action being taken against the Trump administration over its new rules on international students. Last week Wednesday, Harvard and MIT asked for court intervention to block the order, too, saying it put an undue burden on its students to make difficult decisions pitting their health against their desires to continue studying in the U.S. Johns Hopkins University also filed a lawsuit on Friday over the matter.
“We will pursue this case vigorously so that our international students, and international students at institutions across the country, can continue their studies without the threat of deportation,” Harvard President Lawrence Bacow said.
The decision from ICE, Bacow added, appeared to be political in his opinion, an attempt by the Trump administration to “place pressure on colleges and universities to open their on-campus classrooms for in-person instruction this fall, without regard to concerns for the health and safety of students, instructors and others,” he added.
The Trump administration has been adamant about schools and universities reopening their doors this fall, in spite of the steady rise of coronavirus cases across the country.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.